Re: Question about ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() non-monotonic behavior

From: John Stultz
Date: Wed Oct 12 2022 - 23:07:45 EST

Next message: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 01/63] staging: r8188eu: do not spam the kernel log"
Previous message: srinivas pandruvada: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 4/4] thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash"
In reply to: John Stultz: "Re: Question about ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() non-monotonic behavior"
Next in thread: Yosry Ahmed: "Re: Question about ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() non-monotonic behavior"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 8:02 PM John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:18 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So I think it reasonable to say its bounded by approximately 2 *
> NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ +/- 11%.

Sorry, this should be 2*NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ * 0.11

thanks
-john

Next message: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 01/63] staging: r8188eu: do not spam the kernel log"
Previous message: srinivas pandruvada: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 4/4] thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash"
In reply to: John Stultz: "Re: Question about ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() non-monotonic behavior"
Next in thread: Yosry Ahmed: "Re: Question about ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() non-monotonic behavior"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]