Re: drivers/ata/ahci_st.c:229:34: warning: unused variable 'st_ahci_match'

[Damien Le Moal]

On 2022/10/13 16:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 10/12/22 15:37, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
>> I am at a loss with this one... There are plenty of patterns similar to
>> drivers/ata/ahci_st.c doing something like:
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id st_ahci_match[] = {
>>
>>         { .compatible = "st,ahci", },
>>
>>         { /* sentinel */ }
>>
>> };
>>
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_ahci_match);
>>
>> For instance, in drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c, we have:
>>
>>
>> And countless others like this for STI and other arch too.
>>
>> So if CONFIG_MODULE is not enabled, how come we are not submerged with
>> warnings about unused variables ? Is mips arch special in this regard ?
>> Or am I missing something ?
> 
> It has nothing to do with MIPS, the problem is
> 
>                 .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_ahci_match),
> 
> The 'of_match_ptr()' sets the pointer to NULL when CONFIG_OF is
> disabled, which avoids a build failure when st_ahci_match[]
> itself is in an #ifdef.
> 
> In this driver, there is no #ifdef around st_ahci_match[], so we
> simply want
> 
>                 .of_match_table = st_ahci_match,
> 
> The thing with the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is that it would
> create another reference if CONFIG_MODULE is enabled, but not
> for a built-in driver, so you only get this type of warning
> for randconfig builds that have the driver built-in and OF
> disabled.
> 
> It's a common mistake, and we should probably remove most
> of the of_match_ptr() references as you rarely have drivers
> that optionally use OF support but benefit from compiling
> that support out on kernels without OF.

Got it. Thanks for the info !

Will patch this and check other ata drivers for the same issue.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research