Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling

[Len Brown]

This series of BUG FIXES needs to be marked for -stable.

What testing is it waiting for?
I don't see upstream, in linux-next or in tip -- which means that
nobody is testing it.

Are we supposed to be pulling from the URL below to get the latest???

The latest Intel Hybrid CPUs are sort of a mess without this series.
Distros will need to back-port it.

thanks,
-Len

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:40 AM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dave,
>
> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 09:53 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > Changes since V2:
> > >  - changelog improvements based on Peter' feedback
> > >  - Remove combined tags
> >
> > I fixed those up and started testing your v2 yesterday.
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> >   Can you
> > double-check that this:
> >
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/devel.git/log/?h=cpuid1f
> >
> > Looks the same as your v3?
>
> There is no code difference.
> Just that I have updated the subject and changelog of patch 1/8 per
> Peter' suggestion
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8496afee057d63b83a7ff02ec7f1de8c2d0e97ae.camel@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> thanks,
> rui
>


-- 
Len Brown, Intel