Re: [PATCH] scripts: rust_is_available.sh: Provide hints on how to fix missing pieces

[Geert Stappers]

On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:27:44AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:46:25AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > This might be a bit bikesheddy, but it saves a few roundtrips to the
> > documentation when getting the `make LLVM=1 rustavailable` run to pass.
> 
> Yeah, I have bin there    :-)
> 
>  
> > Stick to the rustup options to avoid too much verbosity.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  scripts/rust_is_available.sh | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Geert Stappers <stappers@xxxxxxxxxxx>


How to prevent that the patch gets lost in the mail?

And how to avoid that reminders like this get contra-productive?
(When to send the next "Please approve or reject the patch"?)


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Silence is hard to parse