In addition, the devfreq driver pass the 'data' from devfreq driver
to governor by using devfreq_add_device. I think that 'devfreq driver'
is more proper
* @data: devfreq driver pass to governors, governor should not change it.
And then, there are extra changes required.
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 63347a5ae599..0c59b7978391 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -776,8 +776,7 @@ static void remove_sysfs_files(struct devfreq *devfreq,
* @dev: the device to add devfreq feature.
* @profile: device-specific profile to run devfreq.
* @governor_name: name of the policy to choose frequency.
- * @data: private data for the governor. The devfreq framework does not
- * touch this value.
+ * @data: devfreq driver pass to governors, governor should not change it.
*/
struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile,
@@ -1011,8 +1010,7 @@ static void devm_devfreq_dev_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
* @dev: the device to add devfreq feature.
* @profile: device-specific profile to run devfreq.
* @governor_name: name of the policy to choose frequency.
- * @data: private data for the governor. The devfreq framework does not
- * touch this value.
+ * @data: devfreq driver pass to governors, governor should not change it.
*
* This function manages automatically the memory of devfreq device using device
* resource management and simplify the free operation for memory of devfreq