Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] net: Fixup netif_attrmask_next_and warning

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:38:56 +0800 Guo Ren wrote:
> > This does not look equivalent, have you tested it?
> >
> > nr_ids is unsigned, doesn't it mean we'll never enter the loop?  
> 
> Yes, you are right. Any unsigned int would break the result.
> (gdb) p (int)-1 < (int)2
> $1 = 1
> (gdb) p (int)-1 < (unsigned int)2
> $2 = 0
> (gdb) p (unsigned int)-1 < (int)2
> $4 = 0
> 
> So it should be:
>  -     for (j = -1; j = netif_attrmask_next_and(j, online_mask, mask, nr_ids),
>  -          j < nr_ids;) {
>  +     for (j = -1; j < (int)nr_ids;
>  +          j = netif_attrmask_next_and(j, online_mask, mask, nr_ids)) {
> 
> Right? Of cause, nr_ids couldn't be 0xffffffff (-1).

No. You can't enter the loop with -1 as the iterator either. 
Let's move on.