Re: [PATCH -next] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Fix some kernel-doc comments

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Fri Oct 14 2022 - 16:49:29 EST




On 10/14/22 06:09, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 05:13:57PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
>> Fix some kernel-doc comments.
>>
>> Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=2399
>
> What fix are you doing below? Please describe (should contain warning
> messages from bugzilla link above).

Yeah, we don't need that link, just the warning messages themselves.

> ---- ranting ----
> When I see social media posts, I often see "Link in bio" phrase. That
> is, instead of posting the full link, the link is placed on URL section
> of a poster's bio and a pointer to it is phrased in relevant posts. What
> if such "link in bio" link changes? The older posts which points to
> different link than in the bio become irrelevant.
>
> I would rather just spell the full link in my posts instead for
> posterity.
> ---- end ranting ----
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
>> index cad29ded3a48..574c88584fbf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
>> @@ -181,8 +181,7 @@ static inline u32 dmtimer_read(struct dmtimer *timer, u32 reg)
>> /**
>> * dmtimer_write - write timer registers in posted and non-posted mode
>> * @timer: timer pointer over which write operation is to perform
>> - * @reg: lowest byte holds the register offset
>> - * @value: data to write into the register
>> + * @val: data to write into the register
>> *
>> * The posted mode bit is encoded in reg. Note that in posted mode, the write
>> * pending bit must be checked. Otherwise a write on a register which has a
>> @@ -925,7 +924,7 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_set_int_enable(struct omap_dm_timer *cookie,
>>
>> /**
>> * omap_dm_timer_set_int_disable - disable timer interrupts
>> - * @timer: pointer to timer handle
>> + * @cookie: pointer to omap dm timer handle
>> * @mask: bit mask of interrupts to be disabled
>> *
>> * Disables the specified timer interrupts for a timer.
>
> Seems like two different fixes, right? These should be splitted into its
> own patch.

That's up to the maintainer IMO.
If I were making this patch, it would be as above, just one patch.


--
~Randy