On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:04:29PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
+static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error)
+{
+ struct psp_device *psp = psp_master;
+ struct sev_device *sev;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ if (!psp || !psp->sev_data)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ sev = psp->sev_data;
+
+ if (sev->snp_inited)
snp_inited? That's silly.
snp_initialized
pls.
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * The SNP_INIT requires the MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA must be set to 0h
/* Clear MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA on all cores before SNP_INIT */
+ * across all cores.
+ */
+ on_each_cpu(snp_set_hsave_pa, NULL, 1);
+
+ /* Issue the SNP_INIT firmware command. */
Useless comment.
+ rc = __sev_do_cmd_locked(SEV_CMD_SNP_INIT, NULL, error);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Prepare for first SNP guest launch after INIT */
+ wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
Can you put a wbinvd() in snp_set_hsave_pa() instead and save yourself
the second IPI?
Or is that order of the commands:
1. clear MSR IPI
2. SNP_INIT
3. WBINVD IPI
4. ...
mandatory?
...
+static int __sev_snp_shutdown_locked(int *error)
+{
+ struct sev_device *sev = psp_master->sev_data;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!sev->snp_inited)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* SHUTDOWN requires the DF_FLUSH */
+ wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
+ __sev_do_cmd_locked(SEV_CMD_SNP_DF_FLUSH, NULL, NULL);
Why isn't this retval checked?
+
+ ret = __sev_do_cmd_locked(SEV_CMD_SNP_SHUTDOWN, NULL, error);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP firmware shutdown failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ sev->snp_inited = false;
+ dev_dbg(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP firmware shutdown\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}
...
void sev_dev_destroy(struct psp_device *psp)
@@ -1287,6 +1385,26 @@ void sev_pci_init(void)
}
}
+ /*
+ * If boot CPU supports the SNP, then first attempt to initialize
s/the SNP/SNP/g
+ * the SNP firmware.
+ */
+ if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP)) {
+ if (!sev_version_greater_or_equal(SNP_MIN_API_MAJOR, SNP_MIN_API_MINOR)) {
+ dev_err(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP support requires firmware version >= %d:%d\n",
+ SNP_MIN_API_MAJOR, SNP_MIN_API_MINOR);
+ } else {
+ rc = sev_snp_init(&error);
+ if (rc) {
+ /*
+ * If we failed to INIT SNP then don't abort the probe.
Who's "we"?
+ * Continue to initialize the legacy SEV firmware.
+ */
+ dev_err(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP: failed to INIT error %#x\n", error);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/* Obtain the TMR memory area for SEV-ES use */
sev_es_tmr = sev_fw_alloc(SEV_ES_TMR_SIZE);
if (!sev_es_tmr)
...
diff --git a/include/linux/psp-sev.h b/include/linux/psp-sev.h
index 01ba9dc46ca3..ef4d42e8c96e 100644
--- a/include/linux/psp-sev.h
+++ b/include/linux/psp-sev.h
@@ -769,6 +769,20 @@ struct sev_data_snp_init_ex {
*/
int sev_platform_init(int *error);
+/**
+ * sev_snp_init - perform SEV SNP_INIT command
+ *
+ * @error: SEV command return code
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 if the SEV successfully processed the command
+ * -%ENODEV if the SEV device is not available
+ * -%ENOTSUPP if the SEV does not support SEV
+ * -%ETIMEDOUT if the SEV command timed out
+ * -%EIO if the SEV returned a non-zero return code
Something's weird with those args. I think it should be
%-ENODEV
and so on...