RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/gsseg: make asm_load_gs_index() take an u16

[Li, Xin3]

> >
> > From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Let gcc know that only the low 16 bits of load_gs_index() argument
> > actually matter. It might allow it to create slightly better code.
> > However, do not propagate this into the prototypes of functions that
> > end up being paravirtualized, to avoid unnecessary changes.
> 
> Using u16 will almost always make the code worse.
> At some point the value has to be masked and/or extended to ensure an out of
> range value doesn't appear in a register.

Any potential issue with this patch set?

> 
> 	David
> 
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1
> 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)