Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add QDU1000 and QRU1000 GCC clock bindings

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sat Oct 15 2022 - 11:02:25 EST


On 14/10/2022 18:10, Melody Olvera wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for global clock controller on QDU1000 and
> QRU1000 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml | 70 ++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.h | 170 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 240 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b0746669e2ad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller for QDU1000 and QRU1000
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> + Qualcomm global clock control module which supports the clocks, resets and
> + power domains on QDU1000 and QRU1000
> +
> + See also:
> + - include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.h
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,gcc-qdu1000
> + - qcom,gcc-qru1000
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: Board XO source
> + - description: Sleep clock source
> + - description: PCIE 0 Pipe clock source
> + - description: PCIE 0 Phy Auxiliary clock source
> + - description: USB3 Phy wrapper pipe clock source
> + minItems: 2
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: bi_tcxo
> + - const: sleep_clk
> + - const: pcie_0_pipe_clk

This does not match your clocks, please test your bindings. I thought
you understood my comment when you confirmed misunderstanding...


Best regards,
Krzysztof