[syzbot] possible deadlock in nilfs_count_free_blocks

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Oct 17 2022 - 03:53:43 EST

Next message: syzbot: "[syzbot] BUG: spinlock bad magic in nilfs_palloc_destroy_cache"
Previous message: Paulo Miguel Almeida: "[PATCH] [next] HID: hyperv: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16341694880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=45d6ce7b7ad7ef455d03
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=15bf870c880000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16b91e9a880000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/db0807eded60/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+45d6ce7b7ad7ef455d03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor408/3031 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000c0c18070 (&dat_lock_key){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: nilfs_count_free_blocks+0x2c/0x6c fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:693

but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000cabc9890 (&nilfs->ns_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: nilfs_put_super+0x4c/0x9c fs/nilfs2/super.c:471

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&nilfs->ns_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x5c/0xcc kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1552
nilfs_set_error fs/nilfs2/super.c:92 [inline]
__nilfs_error+0xb4/0x284 fs/nilfs2/super.c:137
nilfs_bmap_convert_error fs/nilfs2/bmap.c:35 [inline]
nilfs_bmap_lookup_contig+0x98/0xc0 fs/nilfs2/bmap.c:95
nilfs_get_block+0x7c/0x364 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:85
block_truncate_page+0x1b4/0xab4 fs/buffer.c:2583
nilfs_truncate+0xb8/0x178 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:857
nilfs_setattr+0xf8/0x164 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:955
notify_change+0x758/0x7f0 fs/attr.c:420
do_truncate+0x108/0x150 fs/open.c:65
vfs_truncate+0x1dc/0x24c fs/open.c:111
do_sys_truncate+0x94/0x140 fs/open.c:134
__do_sys_truncate fs/open.c:146 [inline]
__se_sys_truncate fs/open.c:144 [inline]
__arm64_sys_truncate+0x20/0x30 fs/open.c:144
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581

-> #0 (&dat_lock_key){.+.+}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
nilfs_count_free_blocks+0x2c/0x6c fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:693
nilfs_set_log_cursor fs/nilfs2/super.c:236 [inline]
nilfs_cleanup_super+0x118/0x1f0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:318
nilfs_put_super+0x54/0x9c fs/nilfs2/super.c:472
generic_shutdown_super+0x8c/0x190 fs/super.c:491
kill_block_super+0x30/0x78 fs/super.c:1427
deactivate_locked_super+0x70/0xe8 fs/super.c:332
deactivate_super+0xd0/0xd4 fs/super.c:363
cleanup_mnt+0x1f8/0x234 fs/namespace.c:1186
__cleanup_mnt+0x20/0x30 fs/namespace.c:1193
task_work_run+0xc4/0x14c kernel/task_work.c:177
resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline]
do_notify_resume+0x174/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:1127
prepare_exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:137 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:142 [inline]
el0_svc+0x9c/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&nilfs->ns_sem);
lock(&dat_lock_key);
lock(&nilfs->ns_sem);
lock(&dat_lock_key);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor408/3031:
#0: ffff0000c902f0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#41){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xc8/0xd4 fs/super.c:362
#1: ffff0000cabc9890 (&nilfs->ns_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: nilfs_put_super+0x4c/0x9c fs/nilfs2/super.c:471

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 3031 Comm: syz-executor408 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
down_read+0x5c/0x78 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
nilfs_count_free_blocks+0x2c/0x6c fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c:693
nilfs_set_log_cursor fs/nilfs2/super.c:236 [inline]
nilfs_cleanup_super+0x118/0x1f0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:318
nilfs_put_super+0x54/0x9c fs/nilfs2/super.c:472
generic_shutdown_super+0x8c/0x190 fs/super.c:491
kill_block_super+0x30/0x78 fs/super.c:1427
deactivate_locked_super+0x70/0xe8 fs/super.c:332
deactivate_super+0xd0/0xd4 fs/super.c:363
cleanup_mnt+0x1f8/0x234 fs/namespace.c:1186
__cleanup_mnt+0x20/0x30 fs/namespace.c:1193
task_work_run+0xc4/0x14c kernel/task_work.c:177
resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline]
do_notify_resume+0x174/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:1127
prepare_exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:137 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:142 [inline]
el0_svc+0x9c/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

Next message: syzbot: "[syzbot] BUG: spinlock bad magic in nilfs_palloc_destroy_cache"
Previous message: Paulo Miguel Almeida: "[PATCH] [next] HID: hyperv: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]