Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: r8188eu: remove {} for single statement blocks

[Deepak R Varma]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:57:16PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
>
> > As per the Linux kernel coding-style guidelines, there is no need to
> > use {} for single statement blocks. Address following checkpatch script
> > complaint:
> > 	WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
>
> It's nice to say something like "Problem identified using checkpatch".
> But putting the verbatim checkpatch message that says what you just said
> doesn't seem necessary.

Understood. That sounds better. Thank you Julia. Will include your feedback in
the next revision.

./drv

>
> julia
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > index 427da7e8ba4c..290affe50d0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > @@ -655,9 +655,8 @@ void *scdb_findEntry(struct adapter *priv, unsigned char *ip_addr)
> >  	hash = __nat25_network_hash(network_addr);
> >  	db = priv->nethash[hash];
> >  	while (db) {
> > -		if (!memcmp(db->networkAddr, network_addr, MAX_NETWORK_ADDR_LEN)) {
> > +		if (!memcmp(db->networkAddr, network_addr, MAX_NETWORK_ADDR_LEN))
> >  			return (void *)db;
> > -		}
> >
> >  		db = db->next_hash;
> >  	}
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >