Re: [PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon Oct 17 2022 - 15:10:10 EST

Next message: Florent Revest: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Add ftrace direct call for arm64"
Previous message: Caleb Connolly: "[PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi8998: add rradc node"
In reply to: Kemeng Shi: "[PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init"
Next in thread: Kemeng Shi: "[PATCH 6/8] blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse == iocg->active"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:00:08AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> There is no iocg_pd_init function. The pd_alloc_fn function pointer of
> iocost policy is set with ioc_pd_init. Just correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

--
tejun

Next message: Florent Revest: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Add ftrace direct call for arm64"
Previous message: Caleb Connolly: "[PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi8998: add rradc node"
In reply to: Kemeng Shi: "[PATCH 5/8] blk-iocost: Correct comment in blk_iocost_init"
Next in thread: Kemeng Shi: "[PATCH 6/8] blk-iocost: Avoid to call current_hweight_max if iocg->inuse == iocg->active"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]