[PATCHv10 10/15] x86/mm, iommu/sva: Make LAM and SVM mutually exclusive
From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Tue Oct 18 2022 - 07:36:40 EST
IOMMU and SVM-capable devices know nothing about LAM and only expect
canonical addresses. Attempt to pass down tagged pointer will lead to
address translation failure.
By default do not allow to enable both LAM and use SVM in the same
process.
The new ARCH_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM arch_prctl() overrides the limitation.
By using the arch_prctl() userspace takes responsibility to never pass
tagged address to the device.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h | 6 ++++--
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 13 +++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c | 12 ++++++++++++
include/linux/mmu_context.h | 4 ++++
6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
index 2fdb390040b5..cce9b32b0d6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h
@@ -9,9 +9,11 @@
#include <linux/bits.h>
/* Uprobes on this MM assume 32-bit code */
-#define MM_CONTEXT_UPROBE_IA32 BIT(0)
+#define MM_CONTEXT_UPROBE_IA32 BIT(0)
/* vsyscall page is accessible on this MM */
-#define MM_CONTEXT_HAS_VSYSCALL BIT(1)
+#define MM_CONTEXT_HAS_VSYSCALL BIT(1)
+/* Allow LAM and SVM coexisting */
+#define MM_CONTEXT_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM BIT(2)
/*
* x86 has arch-specific MMU state beyond what lives in mm_struct.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index b0e9ea23758b..6b9ac2c60cec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static inline void mm_reset_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
mm->context.untag_mask = -1UL;
}
+#define arch_pgtable_dma_compat(mm) \
+ (!mm_lam_cr3_mask(mm) || (mm->context.flags & MM_CONTEXT_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM))
#else
static inline unsigned long mm_lam_cr3_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h
index a31e27b95b19..7bd22defb558 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h
@@ -23,5 +23,6 @@
#define ARCH_GET_UNTAG_MASK 0x4001
#define ARCH_ENABLE_TAGGED_ADDR 0x4002
#define ARCH_GET_MAX_TAG_BITS 0x4003
+#define ARCH_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM 0x4004
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PRCTL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index 9952e9f517ec..8faa8774bb93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -783,6 +783,13 @@ static int prctl_enable_tagged_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_bits)
goto out;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_SVA
+ if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid) &&
+ !(mm->context.flags & MM_CONTEXT_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+#endif
if (!nr_bits) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
@@ -893,6 +900,12 @@ long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long arg2)
(unsigned long __user *)arg2);
case ARCH_ENABLE_TAGGED_ADDR:
return prctl_enable_tagged_addr(task->mm, arg2);
+ case ARCH_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM:
+ if (mmap_write_lock_killable(task->mm))
+ return -EINTR;
+ task->mm->context.flags |= MM_CONTEXT_FORCE_TAGGED_SVM;
+ mmap_write_unlock(task->mm);
+ return 0;
case ARCH_GET_MAX_TAG_BITS:
if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LAM))
return put_user(0, (unsigned long __user *)arg2);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
index 106506143896..593ae2472e2c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
/*
* Helpers for IOMMU drivers implementing SVA
*/
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
@@ -31,6 +33,15 @@ int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
min == 0 || max < min)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Serialize against address tagging enabling */
+ if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
+ return -EINTR;
+
+ if (!arch_pgtable_dma_compat(mm)) {
+ mmap_write_unlock(mm);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock);
/* Is a PASID already associated with this mm? */
if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
@@ -46,6 +57,7 @@ int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
mm_pasid_set(mm, pasid);
out:
mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock);
+ mmap_write_unlock(mm);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_alloc_pasid);
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_context.h b/include/linux/mmu_context.h
index b9b970f7ab45..115e2b518079 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_context.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_context.h
@@ -28,4 +28,8 @@ static inline void leave_mm(int cpu) { }
# define task_cpu_possible(cpu, p) cpumask_test_cpu((cpu), task_cpu_possible_mask(p))
#endif
+#ifndef arch_pgtable_dma_compat
+#define arch_pgtable_dma_compat(mm) true
+#endif
+
#endif
--
2.38.0