Re: [PATCH 2/2] virt/coco/sev-guest: interpret VMM errors from guest request

[Dionna Amalie Glaze]

>
> The GHCB spec has to be OS agnostic, so in the specification I would be
> adding a value of 16 so that this matches. Not sure we don't want to just
> use 2. We might be able to say the VMM error codes will follow the POSIX
> standard, but then the currently defined value of 1 doesn't quite match an
> EPERM.
>
> Thoughts?
>

I also thought it was a bit weird. Let's use 2. I'll send a v2.

-- 
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)