On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:02:33AM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
On 10/17/22 12:37, Mark Brown wrote:I'm not saying don't use regmap, I'm saying why not just do this in the
Is there any great reason to provide support in the regmap core for thisOne reason is to have a common interface with the new FSI regmap. That way
rather than just implementing in drivers/fsi? AFAICT this is just
ending up as an implementation detail of shared code in drivers/fsi and
won't have any external users?
abstracting out the bus transfer is trivial in the new SBEFIFO driver,
assuming the SBEFIFO driver should switch to use the FSI regmap.
But you are correct, I doubt anyone else will use this. I suppose SBEFIFO
may as well not use the regmap and just use some callbacks for whichever bus
transfer...
driver - you can just as easily set the reg_read() and reg_write()
callbacks in an individual driver without needing to create a new regmap
bus type for just that one driver to use.