Re: [PATCH] virt/coco/sev-guest: Initialize err in handle_guest_request

[Dionna Amalie Glaze]

> And currently we have:
>
> static long snp_guest_ioctl(...)
> {
> ..
>   input.fw_err = 0xff;
> ..
> }
>
> Which I think is an attempt to make fw_err make sense if the FW is
> never called, should we try to maintain that property?

fw_err = 0xff doesn't make sense to me actually. It's not a documented
code that the firmware was never called.
Still, we can simply pass fw_err to snp_issue_guest_request rather
than an unsigned long err, since a null pointer results in an -EINVAL.


-- 
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)