Re: [PATCH v11 33/46] KVM: selftests: Hyper-V PV IPI selftest
From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Wed Oct 19 2022 - 18:09:07 EST
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> +static void *vcpu_thread(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = (struct kvm_vcpu *)arg;
> + struct ucall uc;
> + int old;
> + int r;
> + unsigned int exit_reason;
> +
> + r = pthread_setcanceltype(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS, &old);
> + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
> + "pthread_setcanceltype failed on vcpu_id=%u with errno=%d",
> + vcpu->id, r);
> +
> + vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + exit_reason = vcpu->run->exit_reason;
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
> + "vCPU %u exited with unexpected exit reason %u-%s, expected KVM_EXIT_IO",
> + vcpu->id, exit_reason, exit_reason_str(exit_reason));
> +
> + if (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc) == UCALL_ABORT) {
> + TEST_ASSERT(false,
> + "vCPU %u exited with error: %s.\n",
> + vcpu->id, (const char *)uc.args[0]);
REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_N()?
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void cancel_join_vcpu_thread(pthread_t thread, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + void *retval;
> + int r;
> +
> + r = pthread_cancel(thread);
> + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
!r is generally preferred over "r == 0"
> + "pthread_cancel on vcpu_id=%d failed with errno=%d",
> + vcpu->id, r);
Do you happen to know if errno is preserved? I.e. if TEST_ASSERT()'s print of
errno will capture the right errno? If so, this and the pthread_join() assert
can be:
TEST_ASSERT(!r, pthread_cancel() failed on vcpu_id=%d, vcpu->id);
> +
> + r = pthread_join(thread, &retval);
> + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
> + "pthread_join on vcpu_id=%d failed with errno=%d",
> + vcpu->id, r);
...
> + r = pthread_create(&threads[0], NULL, vcpu_thread, vcpu[1]);
> + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
> + "pthread_create halter failed errno=%d", errno);
> +
> + r = pthread_create(&threads[1], NULL, vcpu_thread, vcpu[2]);
> + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
> + "pthread_create halter failed errno=%d", errno);
Similar comments as above.
> +
> + while (true) {
> + r = _vcpu_run(vcpu[0]);
> + exit_reason = vcpu[0]->run->exit_reason;
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(!r, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", r);
Why use _vcpu_run() with a manual assert? Won't the vanilla vcpu_run() do what
you want?