Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 03/12] net: bridge: enable bridge to install locked fdb entries from drivers

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:29:06PM +0200, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2022-10-20 14:55, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:56:10PM +0200, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> > > index 8f3d76c751dd..c6b938c01a74 100644
> > > --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> > > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct
> > > net_bridge *br,
> > >  	item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
> > >  	item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
> > >  	item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
> > > +	item->locked = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be set to 0 here, since it is the bridge->driver
> > direction?
> 
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to allow drivers to add what corresponds to a blackhole
> entry when using the bridge input chain to activate the MAB feature, or in general
> to leave the decision of what to do to the driver implementation?

The patch doesn't propose that. It proposes:

| net: bridge: enable bridge to install locked fdb entries from drivers
| 
| The bridge will be able to install locked entries when receiving
| SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE notifications from drivers.

Please write patches which make just one logical change, and explain the
justification for that change and precisely that change in the commit
message.