Re: [PATCH V2] x86/split_lock: Add sysctl to control the misery mode

[Dave Hansen]

On 10/21/22 12:03, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
...
>> 	if (need_release_sem)
>> 		up(...);
>>
>> That's nice and compact.  It's also logically easy to follow because you
>> can see how the need_release_sem gets set only after the
>> down_interruptible().  It's also nice to have both sites share the
>> 'need_release_sem' naming for grepping.
>>
> 
> ...but, this is a very good suggestion, and will eliminate the need for
> two delayed_works, right?

Yes, that too.