[PATCH v6 3/5] KVM: selftests: Add atoi_paranoid() to catch errors missed by atoi()

From: Vipin Sharma
Date: Fri Oct 21 2022 - 17:19:10 EST

Next message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH 3/5] compiler-gcc: remove attribute support check for `__no_sanitize_thread__`"
Previous message: Vipin Sharma: "[PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: selftests: Allowing running dirty_log_perf_test on specific CPUs"
In reply to: Vipin Sharma: "[PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: selftests: Allowing running dirty_log_perf_test on specific CPUs"
Next in thread: Vipin Sharma: "[PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input validation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

atoi() doesn't detect errors. There is no way to know that a 0 return
is correct conversion or due to an error.

Introduce atoi_paranoid() to detect errors and provide correct
conversion. Replace all atoi() calls with atoi_paranoid().

Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
.../selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c | 8 ++++----
.../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c | 6 +++---
.../selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 8 ++++----
.../testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h | 2 ++
.../selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/kvm/max_guest_memory_test.c | 6 +++---
.../kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c | 4 ++--
.../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 10 +++++-----
.../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c | 4 ++--
13 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
index 574eb73f0e90..251e7ff04883 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hn:i:p:m:")) != -1) {
switch (opt) {
case 'n':
- test_args.nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ test_args.nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (test_args.nr_vcpus <= 0) {
pr_info("Positive value needed for -n\n");
goto err;
@@ -425,21 +425,21 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
}
break;
case 'i':
- test_args.nr_iter = atoi(optarg);
+ test_args.nr_iter = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (test_args.nr_iter <= 0) {
pr_info("Positive value needed for -i\n");
goto err;
}
break;
case 'p':
- test_args.timer_period_ms = atoi(optarg);
+ test_args.timer_period_ms = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (test_args.timer_period_ms <= 0) {
pr_info("Positive value needed for -p\n");
goto err;
}
break;
case 'm':
- test_args.migration_freq_ms = atoi(optarg);
+ test_args.migration_freq_ms = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (test_args.migration_freq_ms < 0) {
pr_info("0 or positive value needed for -m\n");
goto err;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c
index 17417220a083..ae90b718070a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c
@@ -824,16 +824,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hn:e:l:")) != -1) {
switch (opt) {
case 'n':
- nr_irqs = atoi(optarg);
+ nr_irqs = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (nr_irqs > 1024 || nr_irqs % 32)
help(argv[0]);
break;
case 'e':
- eoi_split = (bool)atoi(optarg);
+ eoi_split = (bool)atoi_paranoid(optarg);
default_args = false;
break;
case 'l':
- level_sensitive = (bool)atoi(optarg);
+ level_sensitive = (bool)atoi_paranoid(optarg);
default_args = false;
break;
case 'h':
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
index 76c583a07ea2..c6bcc5301e2c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
params.vcpu_memory_bytes = parse_size(optarg);
break;
case 'v':
- params.nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ params.nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
break;
case 'o':
overlap_memory_access = true;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
index 779ae54f89c4..82597fb04146 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
p.src_type = parse_backing_src_type(optarg);
break;
case 'v':
- nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
TEST_ASSERT(nr_vcpus > 0 && nr_vcpus <= max_vcpus,
"Invalid number of vcpus, must be between 1 and %d", max_vcpus);
break;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
index 5bb6954b2358..ecda802b78ff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run_vcpus_while_disabling_dirty_logging = true;
break;
case 'f':
- p.wr_fract = atoi(optarg);
+ p.wr_fract = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
TEST_ASSERT(p.wr_fract >= 1,
"Write fraction cannot be less than one");
break;
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
help(argv[0]);
break;
case 'i':
- p.iterations = atoi(optarg);
+ p.iterations = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
break;
case 'm':
guest_modes_cmdline(optarg);
@@ -445,12 +445,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
p.backing_src = parse_backing_src_type(optarg);
break;
case 'v':
- nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
TEST_ASSERT(nr_vcpus > 0 && nr_vcpus <= max_vcpus,
"Invalid number of vcpus, must be between 1 and %d", max_vcpus);
break;
case 'x':
- p.slots = atoi(optarg);
+ p.slots = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
break;
default:
help(argv[0]);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
index befc754ce9b3..feae42863759 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
@@ -152,4 +152,6 @@ static inline void *align_ptr_up(void *x, size_t size)
return (void *)align_up((unsigned long)x, size);
}

+int atoi_paranoid(const char *num_str);
+
#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_TEST_UTIL_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c
index f42c6ac6d71d..ea7feb69bb88 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
p.test_mem_size = parse_size(optarg);
break;
case 'v':
- nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
TEST_ASSERT(nr_vcpus > 0 && nr_vcpus <= max_vcpus,
"Invalid number of vcpus, must be between 1 and %d", max_vcpus);
break;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
index 6d23878bbfe1..ec0f070a6f21 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c
@@ -334,3 +334,22 @@ long get_run_delay(void)

return val[1];
}
+
+int atoi_paranoid(const char *num_str)
+{
+ char *end_ptr;
+ long num;
+
+ errno = 0;
+ num = strtol(num_str, &end_ptr, 10);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!errno, "strtol(\"%s\") failed", num_str);
+ TEST_ASSERT(num_str != end_ptr,
+ "strtol(\"%s\") didn't find a valid integer.\n", num_str);
+ TEST_ASSERT(*end_ptr == '\0',
+ "strtol(\"%s\") failed to parse trailing characters \"%s\".\n",
+ num_str, end_ptr);
+ TEST_ASSERT(num >= INT_MIN && num <= INT_MAX,
+ "%ld not in range of [%d, %d]", num, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
+
+ return num;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/max_guest_memory_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/max_guest_memory_test.c
index 9a6e4f3ad6b5..1595b73dc09a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/max_guest_memory_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/max_guest_memory_test.c
@@ -193,15 +193,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "c:h:m:s:H")) != -1) {
switch (opt) {
case 'c':
- nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
TEST_ASSERT(nr_vcpus > 0, "number of vcpus must be >0");
break;
case 'm':
- max_mem = atoi(optarg) * size_1gb;
+ max_mem = atoi_paranoid(optarg) * size_1gb;
TEST_ASSERT(max_mem > 0, "memory size must be >0");
break;
case 's':
- slot_size = atoi(optarg) * size_1gb;
+ slot_size = atoi_paranoid(optarg) * size_1gb;
TEST_ASSERT(slot_size > 0, "slot size must be >0");
break;
case 'H':
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
index 6ee7e1dde404..865276993ffb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
guest_percpu_mem_size = parse_size(optarg);
break;
case 'v':
- nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
+ nr_vcpus = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
TEST_ASSERT(nr_vcpus > 0 && nr_vcpus <= max_vcpus,
"Invalid number of vcpus, must be between 1 and %d",
max_vcpus);
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
p.partition_vcpu_memory_access = false;
break;
case 'i':
- p.nr_memslot_modifications = atoi(optarg);
+ p.nr_memslot_modifications = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
break;
case 'h':
default:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index 44995446d942..4bae9e3f5ca1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -885,21 +885,21 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
map_unmap_verify = true;
break;
case 's':
- targs->nslots = atoi(optarg);
+ targs->nslots = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) {
pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n");
return false;
}
break;
case 'f':
- targs->tfirst = atoi(optarg);
+ targs->tfirst = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (targs->tfirst < 0) {
pr_info("First test to run has to be non-negative\n");
return false;
}
break;
case 'e':
- targs->tlast = atoi(optarg);
+ targs->tlast = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (targs->tlast < 0 || targs->tlast >= NTESTS) {
pr_info("Last test to run has to be non-negative and less than %zu\n",
NTESTS);
@@ -907,14 +907,14 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
}
break;
case 'l':
- targs->seconds = atoi(optarg);
+ targs->seconds = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (targs->seconds < 0) {
pr_info("Test length in seconds has to be non-negative\n");
return false;
}
break;
case 'r':
- targs->runs = atoi(optarg);
+ targs->runs = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
if (targs->runs <= 0) {
pr_info("Runs per test has to be positive\n");
return false;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
index 0d55f508d595..c366949c8362 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])

#ifdef __x86_64__
if (argc > 1)
- loops = atoi(argv[1]);
+ loops = atoi_paranoid(argv[1]);
else
loops = 10;

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c
index 59ffe7fd354f..354b6902849c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c
@@ -241,10 +241,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hp:t:r")) != -1) {
switch (opt) {
case 'p':
- reclaim_period_ms = atoi(optarg);
+ reclaim_period_ms = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
break;
case 't':
- token = atoi(optarg);
+ token = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
break;
case 'r':
reboot_permissions = true;
--
2.38.0.135.g90850a2211-goog

Next message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH 3/5] compiler-gcc: remove attribute support check for `__no_sanitize_thread__`"
Previous message: Vipin Sharma: "[PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: selftests: Allowing running dirty_log_perf_test on specific CPUs"
In reply to: Vipin Sharma: "[PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: selftests: Allowing running dirty_log_perf_test on specific CPUs"
Next in thread: Vipin Sharma: "[PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input validation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]