Re: [PATCH] udf: Avoid double brelse() in udf_rename()
From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Oct 24 2022 - 15:28:36 EST
On Sun 23-10-22 18:57:41, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> syzbot reported a warning like below [1]:
>
> VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 7301 at fs/buffer.c:1145 __brelse+0x67/0xa0
> ...
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> invalidate_bh_lru+0x99/0x150
> smp_call_function_many_cond+0xe2a/0x10c0
> ? generic_remap_file_range_prep+0x50/0x50
> ? __brelse+0xa0/0xa0
> ? __mutex_lock+0x21c/0x12d0
> ? smp_call_on_cpu+0x250/0x250
> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xb/0x60
> ? lock_release+0x587/0x810
> ? __brelse+0xa0/0xa0
> ? generic_remap_file_range_prep+0x50/0x50
> on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x3c/0x80
> blkdev_flush_mapping+0x13a/0x2f0
> blkdev_put_whole+0xd3/0xf0
> blkdev_put+0x222/0x760
> deactivate_locked_super+0x96/0x160
> deactivate_super+0xda/0x100
> cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x3d0
> task_work_run+0x149/0x240
> ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30
> do_exit+0xb29/0x2a40
> ? reacquire_held_locks+0x4a0/0x4a0
> ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12a/0x2b0
> ? mm_update_next_owner+0x7c0/0x7c0
> ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
> ? zap_other_threads+0x234/0x2d0
> do_group_exit+0xd0/0x2a0
> __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50
> do_syscall_64+0x34/0xb0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> The cause of the issue is that brelse() is called on both ofibh.sbh
> and ofibh.ebh by udf_find_entry() when it returns NULL. However,
> brelse() is called by udf_rename(), too. So, b_count on buffer_head
> becomes unbalanced.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by not calling brelse() by udf_rename()
> when udf_find_entry() returns NULL.
>
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8297f45698159c6bca8a1f87dc983667c1a1c851 [1]
> Reported-by: syzbot+7902cd7684bc35306224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks! I've added the fix to my tree.
Honza
> ---
> fs/udf/namei.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/namei.c b/fs/udf/namei.c
> index fb4c30e05245..d6081538bfc0 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/namei.c
> @@ -1091,8 +1091,9 @@ static int udf_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *old_dir,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ofi = udf_find_entry(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name, &ofibh, &ocfi);
> - if (IS_ERR(ofi)) {
> - retval = PTR_ERR(ofi);
> + if (!ofi || IS_ERR(ofi)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ofi))
> + retval = PTR_ERR(ofi);
> goto end_rename;
> }
>
> @@ -1101,8 +1102,7 @@ static int udf_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *old_dir,
>
> brelse(ofibh.sbh);
> tloc = lelb_to_cpu(ocfi.icb.extLocation);
> - if (!ofi || udf_get_lb_pblock(old_dir->i_sb, &tloc, 0)
> - != old_inode->i_ino)
> + if (udf_get_lb_pblock(old_dir->i_sb, &tloc, 0) != old_inode->i_ino)
> goto end_rename;
>
> nfi = udf_find_entry(new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name, &nfibh, &ncfi);
> --
> 2.37.3
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR