Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: mmc: mtk-sd: Set clocks based on compatible

[Frank Wunderlich]

Am 24. Oktober 2022 18:43:53 MESZ schrieb "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>Hi,
>
>thank you for picking this up.
>
>On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> The binding was describing a single clock list for all platforms, but
>> that's not really suitable:
>> 
>> Most platforms using at least 2 clocks (source, hclk), some of them
>> a third "source_cg". Mt2712 requires an extra 'bus_clk' on some of
>> its controllers, while mt8192 requires 8 clocks.
>> 
>> Move the clock definitions inside if blocks that match on the
>> compatibles.
>> 
>> I used Patch from Nícolas F. R. A. Prado and modified it to not using
>> "not" statement.
>> 
>> Fixes: 59a23395d8aa ("dt-bindings: mmc: Add support for MT8192 SoC")
>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - add this patch
>> v3:
>> - add blank lines and change "not" to matchlist
>> - reorder entries - make generic first then order alphanumeric
>> - rewrite commit description
>> - drop soc-specific mt8183 - constraints were also set for it above
>
>This is wrong, see below.

You are right,will fix in v4

>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml       | 113 +++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
>> index 3cbf0208f1b4..31bb6dc329d2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
>[..]
>>  
>> -if:
>> -  properties:
>> -    compatible:
>> -      contains:
>> -        const: mediatek,mt8183-mmc
>> -then:
>> -  properties:
>> -    reg:
>> -      minItems: 2
>
>You can't drop this. Nodes with the mt8183 compatible should keep requiring two
>reg values. It's not covered by the branch below.
>
>Thanks,
>Nícolas


regards Frank