Re: [PATCH 6/9] coresight-tpdm: Add node to set dsb programming mode

From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Mon Oct 24 2022 - 17:00:20 EST


On 08/09/2022 09:45, Tao Zhang wrote:
Add node to set and show programming mode for TPDM DSB subunit.
Once the DSB programming mode is set, it will be written to the
register DSB_CR. Bit[10:9] of the DSB_CR register is used to set
the DSB test mode.

Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 10 ++++++
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index fae9963..7265793 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(tpdm_devs, "tpdm");
static void tpdm_enable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
{
- u32 val;
+ u32 val, mode;
val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_TIER);
/* Set trigger timestamp */
@@ -42,6 +42,19 @@ static void tpdm_enable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
/* Set the enable bit of DSB control register to 1 */
val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
+ /* Set the cycle accurate mode */
+ mode = TPDM_DSB_MODE_CYCACC(drvdata->dsb->mode);
+ val = val & ~(0x7 << 9);
+ val = val | (mode << 9);

Please do not hard code numbers like that above. Please could
you define proper masks for the fields in DSB_CR and use
FIELD_GET, FIELD_PREP for setting the values.

+ /* Set the byte lane for high-performance mode */
+ mode = TPDM_DSB_MODE_HPBYTESEL(drvdata->dsb->mode);
+ val = val & ~(0x1F << 2);
+ val = val | (mode << 2);
+ /* Set the performance mode */

Same as above.

+ if (drvdata->dsb->mode & TPDM_DSB_MODE_PERF)
+ val |= TPDM_DSB_MODE;
+ else
+ val &= ~TPDM_DSB_MODE;
val |= TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA;
writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
}
@@ -232,6 +245,39 @@ static struct attribute_group tpdm_attr_grp = {
.attrs = tpdm_attrs,
};
+static ssize_t dsb_mode_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+ if (!(drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB))
+ return -EPERM;

As mentioned earlier, use is_visble() instead of hard coding this
in every function.

+
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%lx\n",
+ (unsigned long)drvdata->dsb->mode);
+}
+
+static ssize_t dsb_mode_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ if ((kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val)) || val < 0 || val > 3)

Why not leave kstrtoul to detect the base instead of always forcing
16 ? Some other code had forced to base of 10. Please be flexible
and avoid the inconsistencies.

+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ drvdata->dsb->mode = val & TPDM_MODE_ALL;
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_mode);
+
static ssize_t dsb_trig_type_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -312,6 +358,7 @@ static ssize_t dsb_trig_ts_store(struct device *dev,
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_trig_ts);
static struct attribute *tpdm_dsb_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_dsb_mode.attr,
&dev_attr_dsb_trig_ts.attr,
&dev_attr_dsb_trig_type.attr,
NULL,
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
index dd4a013..4d57488 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
@@ -19,6 +19,14 @@
#define TPDM_DSB_XTRIG_TSENAB BIT(1)
/* Enable bit for DSB subunit trigger type */
#define TPDM_DSB_TRIG_TYPE BIT(12)
+/* Enable bit for DSB subunit perfmance mode */
+#define TPDM_DSB_MODE BIT(1)
+
+/* DSB programming modes */
+#define TPDM_DSB_MODE_CYCACC(val) BMVAL(val, 0, 2)
+#define TPDM_DSB_MODE_PERF BIT(3)
+#define TPDM_DSB_MODE_HPBYTESEL(val) BMVAL(val, 4, 8)

Please could we use GENMASK to define the masks and
use FIELD_GET/FILED_PREP macros for the dealing with
the fields ?

Similarly for the DSB_CR register please.

Suzuki