Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mm: Use pte marker for swapin errors
From: Huang, Ying
Date: Mon Oct 24 2022 - 23:02:56 EST
Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This series uses the pte marker to replace the swapin error swap entry,
> then we safe one more swap entry. A new pte marker bit is defined.
~~~~ ~~~~~
save? file?
It's good to save one swap file. Thanks for your patch! Please feel
free to add my
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
for the whole series.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> One thing worth mentioning: we need the pte marker to be always built to
> make sure it works like before, so I made an attempt in patch 1 to drop
> CONFIG_PTE_MARKER and always compile pte marker in. Since pte markers are
> enabled in many distributions by default already, meanwhile the codeset is
> really small I assume it's fine. But still I'm tagging with RFC for this
> initial version.
>
> Smoke tested on anonymous mem on a fake swap failure. Please have a look,
> thanks.
>
> Peter Xu (2):
> mm: Always compile in pte markers
> mm: Use pte markers for swap errors
>
> include/linux/swap.h | 16 ++++----------
> include/linux/swapops.h | 49 +++++++++--------------------------------
> mm/Kconfig | 7 ------
> mm/memory.c | 13 ++++++-----
> mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
> mm/swapfile.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)