Re: [PATCH 4.9 158/159] thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use first online CPU as control_cpu

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> commit 4bb7f6c2781e46fc5bd00475a66df2ea30ef330d upstream.
> 
> Commit 68b99e94a4a2 ("thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead
> of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash") fixed an issue related to using
> smp_processor_id() in preemptible context by replacing it with a pair
> of get_cpu()/put_cpu(), but what is needed there really is any online
> CPU and not necessarily the one currently running the code.  Arguably,
> getting the one that's running the code in there is confusing.
> 
> For this reason, simply give the control CPU role to the first online
> one which automatically will be CPU0 if it is online, so one check
> can be dropped from the code for an added benefit.

While this is nice cleanup (and I complained about original code being
interesting) original code still looks okay and we don't really need this in
stable.

Thanks and best regards,
								Pavel

> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -518,11 +518,7 @@ static int start_power_clamp(void)
>  	get_online_cpus();
>  
>  	/* prefer BSP */
> -	control_cpu = 0;
> -	if (!cpu_online(control_cpu)) {
> -		control_cpu = get_cpu();
> -		put_cpu();
> -	}
> +	control_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>  
>  	clamping = true;
>  	schedule_delayed_work(&poll_pkg_cstate_work, 0);
> 

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature