Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: marvell-nand: Convert to YAML DT scheme

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 25/10/2022 08:52, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:25:01 -0400, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 25/10/2022 06:17, Vadym Kochan wrote:
>>> Switch the DT binding to a YAML schema to enable the DT validation.
>>>
>>> Dropped deprecated compatibles and properties described in txt file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v4:
>>>    1) Remove "label" and "partitions" properties
>>
>> I think you did not read the feedback.
>>
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> +
>>> +  marvell,system-controller:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> +    description: Syscon node that handles NAND controller related registers
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  "^nand@[0-3]$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      reg:
>>> +        minimum: 0
>>> +        maximum: 3
>>> +
>>> +      nand-rb:
>>> +        minimum: 0
>>> +        maximum: 1
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-strength:
>>> +        enum: [1, 4, 8]
>>> +
>>> +      nand-on-flash-bbt: true
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-mode: true
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-algo:
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          This property is essentially useful when not using hardware ECC.
>>> +          Howerver, it may be added when using hardware ECC for clarification
>>> +          but will be ignored by the driver because ECC mode is chosen depending
>>> +          on the page size and the strength required by the NAND chip.
>>> +          This value may be overwritten with nand-ecc-strength property.
>>> +
>>> +      nand-ecc-step-size:
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          Marvell's NAND flash controller does use fixed strength
>>> +          (1-bit for Hamming, 16-bit for BCH), so the actual step size
>>> +          will shrink or grow in order to fit the required strength.
>>> +          Step sizes are not completely random for all and follow certain
>>> +          patterns described in AN-379, "Marvell SoC NFC ECC".
>>> +
>>> +      marvell,nand-keep-config:
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          Orders the driver not to take the timings from the core and
>>> +          leaving them completely untouched. Bootloader timings will then
>>> +          be used.
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>> +
>>> +      marvell,nand-enable-arbiter:
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          To enable the arbiter, all boards blindly used it,
>>> +          this bit was set by the bootloader for many boards and even if
>>> +          it is marked reserved in several datasheets, it might be needed to set
>>> +          it (otherwise it is harmless) so whether or not this property is set,
>>> +          the bit is selected by the driver.
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>> +        deprecated: true
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - reg
>>> +      - nand-rb
>>
>> I have no clue why you are doing some random changes. Now you dropped
>> additionalProperties for nand@ about which no one asked you to drop.
>>
>> No. It *must* be here.
> 
> Sorry for this mess, I was confused with the "label" and "partitions"
> because I got errors about these properties when I used only
> "additionalProperties: false", so I tried to put reference to partition.yaml.
> 
> Then I looked at other nand-controllers schemas and I did not find inclusion of partition.yaml
> for them so I decided to just drop it at all. My understanding is that "additionalProperties:false"
> is needed for nand@ if to have "label" and "partitions" properties, otherwise it is not needed.

A final schema (not used by other schemas) must always finish with
additional/unevaluatedProperties false. You have errors since beginning
- I wrote about it in your first patchset (v1). You had error visible
after adding proper unevaluatedProperties in proper place.

You have partitions node, for partitions. But you reference only *one*
partition.

Best regards,
Krzysztof