[PATCH v3 03/17] timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer_interrupt()

From: Anna-Maria Behnsen
Date: Tue Oct 25 2022 - 09:59:52 EST


Both call sides of __next_timer_interrupt() store the return value directly
in base->next_expiry. Move the store into __next_timer_interrupt().

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 717fcb9fb14a..7695c733dfa5 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1571,8 +1571,10 @@ static int next_pending_bucket(struct timer_base *base, unsigned offset,
/*
* Search the first expiring timer in the various clock levels. Caller must
* hold base->lock.
+ *
+ * Store next expiry time in base->next_expiry.
*/
-static unsigned long __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
+static void __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
{
unsigned long clk, next, adj;
unsigned lvl, offset = 0;
@@ -1638,10 +1640,11 @@ static unsigned long __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
clk += adj;
}

+ base->next_expiry = next;
base->next_expiry_recalc = false;
base->timers_pending = !(next == base->clk + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA);

- return next;
+ return;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -1701,7 +1704,7 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)

raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
- base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ __next_timer_interrupt(base);
nextevt = base->next_expiry;

/*
@@ -1784,7 +1787,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc
&& base->timers_pending);
base->clk++;
- base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ __next_timer_interrupt(base);

while (levels--)
expire_timers(base, heads + levels);
--
2.30.2