[PATCH] kernel/locking: Fix spelling mistake "task_strcut" -> "task_struct"

[Usama Arif]

These are in mutex and rwsem code.

Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
 kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index d973fe6041bf..fe7335fb63d4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
 		 * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
 		 * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
 		 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
-		 * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
+		 * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
 		 * period
 		 */
 		barrier();
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 
 	/*
 	 * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
-	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
+	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
 	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
 	 */
 	owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 44873594de03..bb87d28c011c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	preempt_disable();
 	/*
 	 * Disable preemption is equal to the RCU read-side crital section,
-	 * thus the task_strcut structure won't go away.
+	 * thus the task_struct structure won't go away.
 	 */
 	owner = rwsem_owner_flags(sem, &flags);
 	/*
-- 
2.25.1