[PATCH v5 7/7] drm/vc4: Make sure we don't end up with a core clock too high
From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Thu Oct 27 2022 - 08:53:44 EST
Following the clock rate range improvements to the clock framework,
trying to set a disjoint range on a clock will now result in an error.
Thus, we can't set a minimum rate higher than the maximum reported by
the firmware, or clk_set_min_rate() will fail.
Thus we need to clamp the rate we are about to ask for to the maximum
rate possible on that clock.
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
index 4419e810103d..5c97642ed66a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
@@ -396,8 +396,8 @@ static void vc4_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
if (vc4->is_vc5) {
unsigned long state_rate = max(old_hvs_state->core_clock_rate,
new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
- unsigned long core_rate = max_t(unsigned long,
- 500000000, state_rate);
+ unsigned long core_rate = clamp_t(unsigned long, state_rate,
+ 500000000, hvs->max_core_rate);
drm_dbg(dev, "Raising the core clock at %lu Hz\n", core_rate);
@@ -431,14 +431,17 @@ static void vc4_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, state);
if (vc4->is_vc5) {
- drm_dbg(dev, "Running the core clock at %lu Hz\n",
- new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
+ unsigned long core_rate = min_t(unsigned long,
+ hvs->max_core_rate,
+ new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate);
+
+ drm_dbg(dev, "Running the core clock at %lu Hz\n", core_rate);
/*
* Request a clock rate based on the current HVS
* requirements.
*/
- WARN_ON(clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, new_hvs_state->core_clock_rate));
+ WARN_ON(clk_set_min_rate(hvs->core_clk, core_rate));
drm_dbg(dev, "Core clock actual rate: %lu Hz\n",
clk_get_rate(hvs->core_clk));
--
b4 0.11.0-dev-99e3a