[PATCH net-next 5/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API

From: Steen Hegelund
Date: Thu Oct 27 2022 - 10:44:18 EST

Next message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] KVM: x86: Always use non-compat vcpu_runstate_info size for gfn=>pfn cache"
Previous message: Steen Hegelund: "[PATCH net-next 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Let VCAP API validate added key- and actionfields"
In reply to: Steen Hegelund: "[PATCH net-next 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Let VCAP API validate added key- and actionfields"
Next in thread: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This tests that the available keyfield and actionfield add methods are
doing the exepected work: adding the value (and mask) to the
keyfield/actionfield list item in the rule.

The test also covers the functionality that matches a rule to a keyset.

Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 406 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 406 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
index b01a6e5039b0..2141d62e62bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static u32 test_init_start;
static u32 test_init_count;
static u32 test_hw_counter_id;
static struct vcap_cache_data test_hw_cache;
+static struct net_device test_netdev = {};

/* Callback used by the VCAP API */
static enum vcap_keyfield_set test_val_keyset(struct net_device *ndev,
@@ -904,6 +905,409 @@ static void vcap_api_encode_rule_actionset_test(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (u32)0x00000000, actwords[11]);
}

+static void vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct vcap_admin admin = {
+ .vtype = VCAP_TYPE_IS2,
+ };
+ struct vcap_rule_internal ri = {
+ .admin = &admin,
+ .data = {
+ .keyset = VCAP_KFS_NO_VALUE,
+ },
+ .vctrl = &test_vctrl,
+ };
+ struct vcap_rule *rule = (struct vcap_rule *)&ri;
+ struct vcap_client_keyfield *kf;
+ int ret;
+ struct vcap_u128_key dip = {
+ .value = {0x17, 0x26, 0x35, 0x44, 0x63, 0x62, 0x71},
+ .mask = {0xf1, 0xf2, 0xf3, 0xf4, 0x4f, 0x3f, 0x2f, 0x1f},
+ };
+ int idx;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS, VCAP_BIT_0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->keyfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ kf = list_first_entry(&rule->keyfields, struct vcap_client_keyfield,
+ ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS, kf->ctrl.key);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, kf->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, kf->data.u1.value);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, kf->data.u1.mask);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS, VCAP_BIT_1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->keyfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ kf = list_first_entry(&rule->keyfields, struct vcap_client_keyfield,
+ ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS, kf->ctrl.key);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, kf->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, kf->data.u1.value);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, kf->data.u1.mask);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS,
+ VCAP_BIT_ANY);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->keyfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ kf = list_first_entry(&rule->keyfields, struct vcap_client_keyfield,
+ ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS, kf->ctrl.key);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, kf->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, kf->data.u1.value);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, kf->data.u1.mask);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u32(rule, VCAP_KF_TYPE, 0x98765432, 0xff00ffab);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->keyfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ kf = list_first_entry(&rule->keyfields, struct vcap_client_keyfield,
+ ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KF_TYPE, kf->ctrl.key);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, kf->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x98765432, kf->data.u32.value);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xff00ffab, kf->data.u32.mask);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->keyfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u128(rule, VCAP_KF_L3_IP6_SIP, &dip);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->keyfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ kf = list_first_entry(&rule->keyfields, struct vcap_client_keyfield,
+ ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KF_L3_IP6_SIP, kf->ctrl.key);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U128, kf->ctrl.type);
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(dip.value); ++idx)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dip.value[idx], kf->data.u128.value[idx]);
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(dip.mask); ++idx)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dip.mask[idx], kf->data.u128.mask[idx]);
+}
+
+static void vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct vcap_admin admin = {
+ .vtype = VCAP_TYPE_IS2,
+ };
+ struct vcap_rule_internal ri = {
+ .admin = &admin,
+ .data = {
+ .actionset = VCAP_AFS_NO_VALUE,
+ },
+ };
+ struct vcap_rule *rule = (struct vcap_rule *)&ri;
+ struct vcap_client_actionfield *af;
+ int ret;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ af = list_first_entry(&rule->actionfields,
+ struct vcap_client_actionfield, ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, af->data.u1.value);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ af = list_first_entry(&rule->actionfields,
+ struct vcap_client_actionfield, ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x1, af->data.u1.value);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_ANY);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ af = list_first_entry(&rule->actionfields,
+ struct vcap_client_actionfield, ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, af->ctrl.action);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_BIT, af->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x0, af->data.u1.value);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_TYPE, 0x98765432);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ af = list_first_entry(&rule->actionfields,
+ struct vcap_client_actionfield, ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_TYPE, af->ctrl.action);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, af->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0x98765432, af->data.u32.value);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rule->actionfields);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, 0xaabbccdd);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ af = list_first_entry(&rule->actionfields,
+ struct vcap_client_actionfield, ctrl.list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE, af->ctrl.action);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_FIELD_U32, af->ctrl.type);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xaabbccdd, af->data.u32.value);
+}
+
+static void vcap_api_rule_find_keyset_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct vcap_keyset_list matches = {};
+ struct vcap_admin admin = {
+ .vtype = VCAP_TYPE_IS2,
+ };
+ struct vcap_rule_internal ri = {
+ .admin = &admin,
+ .vctrl = &test_vctrl,
+ };
+ struct vcap_client_keyfield ckf_1[] = {
+ {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_TYPE,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_IF_IGR_PORT_MASK_L3,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_IF_IGR_PORT_MASK_RNG,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_IF_IGR_PORT_MASK,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_L2_DMAC,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_ETYPE_LEN_IS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_ETYPE,
+ },
+ };
+ struct vcap_client_keyfield ckf_2[] = {
+ {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_TYPE,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_ARP_OPCODE,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_L3_IP4_SIP,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_L3_IP4_DIP,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_8021Q_PCP_CLS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_ETYPE_LEN_IS, /* Not with ARP */
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_ETYPE, /* Not with ARP */
+ },
+ };
+ struct vcap_client_keyfield ckf_3[] = {
+ {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_TYPE,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_LOOKUP_FIRST_IS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_8021Q_DEI_CLS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_8021Q_PCP_CLS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_8021Q_VID_CLS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_ISDX_CLS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_L2_MC_IS,
+ }, {
+ .ctrl.key = VCAP_KF_L2_BC_IS,
+ },
+ };
+ int idx;
+ bool ret;
+ enum vcap_keyfield_set keysets[10] = {0};
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ri.data.keyfields);
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ckf_1); idx++)
+ list_add_tail(&ckf_1[idx].ctrl.list, &ri.data.keyfields);
+ matches.keysets = keysets;
+ matches.max = ARRAY_SIZE(keysets);
+ memset(keysets, 0, sizeof(keysets));
+
+ ret = vcap_rule_find_keysets(&ri, &matches);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, matches.cnt);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_MAC_ETYPE, matches.keysets[0]);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ri.data.keyfields);
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ckf_2); idx++)
+ list_add_tail(&ckf_2[idx].ctrl.list, &ri.data.keyfields);
+ memset(keysets, 0, sizeof(keysets));
+ ret = vcap_rule_find_keysets(&ri, &matches);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, matches.cnt);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_NO_VALUE, matches.keysets[0]);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ri.data.keyfields);
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ckf_3); idx++)
+ list_add_tail(&ckf_3[idx].ctrl.list, &ri.data.keyfields);
+ memset(keysets, 0, sizeof(keysets));
+ ret = vcap_rule_find_keysets(&ri, &matches);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 6, matches.cnt);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_ARP, matches.keysets[0]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_IP4_OTHER, matches.keysets[1]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_IP4_TCP_UDP, matches.keysets[2]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_IP6_STD, matches.keysets[3]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_IP_7TUPLE, matches.keysets[4]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_MAC_ETYPE, matches.keysets[5]);
+}
+
+static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* Data used by VCAP Library callback */
+ static u32 keydata[32] = {};
+ static u32 mskdata[32] = {};
+ static u32 actdata[32] = {};
+
+ struct vcap_admin is2_admin = {
+ .vtype = VCAP_TYPE_IS2,
+ .first_cid = 10000,
+ .last_cid = 19999,
+ .lookups = 4,
+ .last_valid_addr = 3071,
+ .first_valid_addr = 0,
+ .last_used_addr = 800,
+ .cache = {
+ .keystream = keydata,
+ .maskstream = mskdata,
+ .actionstream = actdata,
+ },
+ };
+ struct vcap_rule *rule = 0;
+ struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = 0;
+ int vcap_chain_id = 10005;
+ enum vcap_user user = VCAP_USER_VCAP_UTIL;
+ u16 priority = 10;
+ int id = 100;
+ int ret;
+ struct vcap_u48_key smac = {
+ .value = { 0x88, 0x75, 0x32, 0x34, 0x9e, 0xb1 },
+ .mask = { 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
+ };
+ struct vcap_u48_key dmac = {
+ .value = { 0x06, 0x05, 0x04, 0x03, 0x02, 0x01 },
+ .mask = { 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
+ };
+ u32 port_mask_rng_value = 0x05;
+ u32 port_mask_rng_mask = 0x0f;
+ u32 igr_port_mask_value = 0xffabcd01;
+ u32 igr_port_mask_mask = ~0;
+ /* counter is not written yet, so it is not in expwriteaddr */
+ u32 expwriteaddr[] = {792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 0};
+ int idx;
+
+ vcap_test_api_init(&is2_admin);
+
+ /* Allocate the rule */
+ rule = vcap_alloc_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, vcap_chain_id, user,
+ priority, id);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, NULL, rule);
+ ri = (struct vcap_rule_internal *)rule;
+
+ /* Add rule keys */
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u48(rule, VCAP_KF_L2_DMAC, &dmac);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u48(rule, VCAP_KF_L2_SMAC, &smac);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_ETYPE_LEN_IS, VCAP_BIT_1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ /* Cannot add the same field twice */
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_ETYPE_LEN_IS, VCAP_BIT_1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EINVAL, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_bit(rule, VCAP_KF_IF_IGR_PORT_MASK_L3,
+ VCAP_BIT_ANY);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u32(rule, VCAP_KF_IF_IGR_PORT_MASK_RNG,
+ port_mask_rng_value, port_mask_rng_mask);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_key_u32(rule, VCAP_KF_IF_IGR_PORT_MASK,
+ igr_port_mask_value, igr_port_mask_mask);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+ /* Add rule actions */
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_bit(rule, VCAP_AF_POLICE_ENA, VCAP_BIT_1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_CNT_ID, id);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_MATCH_ID, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ ret = vcap_rule_add_action_u32(rule, VCAP_AF_MATCH_ID_MASK, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+ /* For now the actionset is hardcoded */
+ ret = vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(rule, VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+ /* Validation with validate keyset callback */
+ ret = vcap_val_rule(rule, ETH_P_ALL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_KFS_MAC_ETYPE, rule->keyset);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE, rule->actionset);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 6, ri->size);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2, ri->keyset_sw_regs);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4, ri->actionset_sw_regs);
+
+ /* Add rule with write callback */
+ ret = vcap_add_rule(rule);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 792, is2_admin.last_used_addr);
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(expwriteaddr); ++idx)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expwriteaddr[idx], test_updateaddr[idx]);
+
+ /* Check that the rule has been added */
+ ret = list_empty(&is2_admin.rules);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, ret);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+ vcap_free_rule(rule);
+
+ /* Check that the rule has been freed: tricky to access since this
+ * memory should not be accessible anymore
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, NULL, rule);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->keyfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
+ ret = list_empty(&rule->actionfields);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, ret);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case vcap_api_full_rule_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(vcap_api_rule_find_keyset_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(vcap_api_encode_rule_test),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite vcap_api_full_rule_test_suite = {
+ .name = "VCAP_API_Full_Rule_Testsuite",
+ .test_cases = vcap_api_full_rule_test_cases,
+};
+
+static struct kunit_case vcap_api_rule_value_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(vcap_api_rule_add_keyvalue_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(vcap_api_rule_add_actionvalue_test),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite vcap_api_rule_value_test_suite = {
+ .name = "VCAP_API_Rule_Value_Testsuite",
+ .test_cases = vcap_api_rule_value_test_cases,
+};
+
static struct kunit_case vcap_api_encoding_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(vcap_api_set_bit_1_test),
KUNIT_CASE(vcap_api_set_bit_0_test),
@@ -930,4 +1334,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite vcap_api_encoding_test_suite = {
.test_cases = vcap_api_encoding_test_cases,
};

+kunit_test_suite(vcap_api_full_rule_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suite(vcap_api_rule_value_test_suite);
kunit_test_suite(vcap_api_encoding_test_suite);
--
2.38.1

Next message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] KVM: x86: Always use non-compat vcpu_runstate_info size for gfn=>pfn cache"
Previous message: Steen Hegelund: "[PATCH net-next 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Let VCAP API validate added key- and actionfields"
In reply to: Steen Hegelund: "[PATCH net-next 4/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Let VCAP API validate added key- and actionfields"
Next in thread: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: microchip: sparx5: Adding KUNIT tests of key/action values in VCAP API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]