Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add QDU1000 and QRU1000 GCC clock bindings
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Oct 27 2022 - 11:55:03 EST
On 26/10/2022 15:04, Melody Olvera wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for global clock controller on QDU1000 and
> QRU1000 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml | 77 ++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.h | 170 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ad460d628ffc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller for QDU1000 and QRU1000
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> + Qualcomm global clock control module which supports the clocks, resets and
> + power domains on QDU1000 and QRU1000
> +
> + See also:
> + - include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qdu1000.h
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: qcom,gcc-qdu1000
> + - const: syscon
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: Board XO source
> + - description: Sleep clock source
> + - description: PCIE 0 Pipe clock source
> + - description: PCIE 0 Phy Auxiliary clock source
> + - description: USB3 Phy wrapper pipe clock source
> + minItems: 2
Why the clocks are optional?
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: bi_tcxo
> + - const: sleep_clk
> + - const: pcie_0_pipe_clk
> + minItems: 2
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Krzysztof