Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 00/31] timers: Use del_timer_shutdown() before freeing timers

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Oct 27 2022 - 15:21:16 EST


On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:58:59 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/27/22 08:05, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Back in April, I posted an RFC patch set to help mitigate a common issue
> > where a timer gets armed just before it is freed, and when the timer
> > goes off, it crashes in the timer code without any evidence of who the
> > culprit was. I got side tracked and never finished up on that patch set.
> > Since this type of crash is still our #1 crash we are seeing in the field,
> > it has become a priority again to finish it.
> >
> > This is v2 of that patch set. Thomas Gleixner posted an untested version
> > that makes timer->function NULL as the flag that it is shutdown. I took that
> > code, tested it (fixed it up), added more comments, and changed the
> > name to del_timer_shutdown() as Linus had asked. I also converted it to use
> > WARN_ON_ONCE() instead of just WARN_ON() as Linus asked for that too.
> >
>
> I rebased the series on top of v6.1-rc2 and gave it a try. Unfortunately it
> blows up in my face, first with
>
> [ 16.212535] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 16.212887] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: tcp_write_timer+0x0/0x190
> [ 16.213725] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 310 at lib/debugobjects.c:502 debug_print_object+0xb8/0x100
>
> which, of course, might be real, but after a couple of those I get
>
> [ 16.325257] Insufficient stack space to handle exception!
> [ 16.325326] ESR: 0x0000000096000047 -- DABT (current EL)
> [ 16.325355] FAR: 0xffff800008677fe0
> [ 16.325366] Task stack: [0xffff800008678000..0xffff80000867c000]
> [ 16.325376] IRQ stack: [0xffff800008000000..0xffff800008004000]
> [ 16.325387] Overflow stack: [0xffff51e19feab300..0xffff51e19feac300]
> [ 16.325406] CPU: 0 PID: 310 Comm: telnet Tainted: G W N 6.1.0-rc2-00032-g895257c4037a #1
> [ 16.325425] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 16.325434] pstate: 400000c5 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 16.325450] pc : mark_lock+0x4/0x620
> [ 16.325482] lr : __lock_acquire+0x3e8/0x1950
> [ 16.325493] sp : ffff800008678090
> [ 16.325499] x29: ffff800008678090 x28: ffff51e18651ccc0 x27: ffffc690a5583000
> [ 16.325530] x26: ffff51e18651d590 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: 0000000000000001
> [ 16.325552] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000028 x21: ffff51e18651d568
> [ 16.325571] x20: ffffc690a61b5710 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [ 16.325589] x17: 6e6968207473696c x16: 5f72656d6974203a x15: 6570797420746365
> [ 16.325608] x14: 6a626f2029302065 x13: ffffc690a55a78c0 x12: 00000000000c02e7
> [ 16.325626] x11: 0000000030fa562e x10: ffffc690a5a9f208 x9 : ffffc690a5a9f200
> [ 16.325645] x8 : ffff51e18651ccc0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000002e9fa
> [ 16.325663] x5 : 0000000000000028 x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : 00000000000c0003
> [ 16.325681] x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : ffff51e18651d590 x0 : ffff51e18651ccc0
> [ 16.325902] Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow
> [ 16.325992] CPU: 0 PID: 310 Comm: telnet Tainted: G W N 6.1.0-rc2-00032-g895257c4037a #1
> [ 16.326008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 16.326026] Call trace:
> [ 16.326031] dump_backtrace.part.0+0xe0/0xf0
> [ 16.326048] show_stack+0x18/0x40
> [ 16.326058] dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd8
> [ 16.326073] dump_stack+0x18/0x34
> [ 16.326083] panic+0x194/0x38c
> [ 16.326093] nmi_panic+0xac/0xb0
> [ 16.326103] panic_bad_stack+0x104/0x124
> [ 16.326113] handle_bad_stack+0x34/0xe0
> [ 16.326124] __bad_stack+0x78/0x7c
> [ 16.326134] mark_lock+0x4/0x620
> [ 16.326144] lock_acquire.part.0+0xf0/0x26c
> [ 16.326155] lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
> [ 16.326166] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0x150
> [ 16.326178] debug_object_assert_init+0xa0/0x1a4
> [ 16.326193] __try_to_del_timer_sync+0x40/0xdc
> [ 16.326207] __del_timer_sync+0xa4/0x100
> [ 16.326218] timer_fixup_free+0x2c/0x54
> [ 16.326229] debug_object_free.part.0+0x188/0x1b0
> ...
> (many more of those)
> ...
> [ 16.329989] timer_fixup_free+0x40/0x54

Ah, I see the issue here. Looks like the timer_fixup_free() is calling
itself and crashing.

Let me take a look into that. I didn't touch the fixup code, and there
could be an assumption there that it's behaving with the old approach.

-- Steve


> [ 16.329996] __debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1ec/0x25c
> [ 16.330003] debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x20/0x90
> [ 16.330009] slab_free_freelist_hook.constprop.0+0xac/0x1b0
> [ 16.330019] kmem_cache_free+0x1ac/0x500
> [ 16.330026] __sk_destruct+0x140/0x2a0
> [ 16.330035] sk_destruct+0x54/0x64
> [ 16.330042] __sk_free+0x74/0x120
> [ 16.330048] sk_free+0x64/0x8c
> [ 16.330055] tcp_close+0x94/0xc0
> [ 16.330064] inet_release+0x50/0xb0
> [ 16.330071] __sock_release+0x44/0xbc
> [ 16.330076] sock_close+0x18/0x30
> [ 16.330081] __fput+0x84/0x270
> [ 16.330088] ____fput+0x10/0x20
> [ 16.330094] task_work_run+0x88/0xf0
> [ 16.330102] do_exit+0x334/0xafc
> [ 16.330108] do_group_exit+0x34/0x90
> [ 16.330115] __arm64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20
> [ 16.330121] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
> [ 16.330133] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x60/0x11c
> [ 16.330146] do_el0_svc+0x30/0xd0
> [ 16.330157] el0_svc+0x48/0xc0
> [ 16.330170] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xbc/0x13c
> [ 16.330179] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
> [ 16.330645] Kernel Offset: 0x46909ae00000 from 0xffff800008000000
> [ 16.330664] PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffae1ec0000000
> [ 16.330686] CPU features: 0x22000,2033c080,0000421b
> [ 16.330752] Memory Limit: none
>
> This is with arm64_defconfig plus various debug options.
> Running the same test with v6.0.4 produces no errors, and neither
> does running it with v6.1-rc2-105-gb229b6ca5abb (current mainline).
>
> Guenter