RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Use 'else' in ufshcd_hba_enable()

[Keoseong Park]

Hi Bart,

>On 10/26/22 23:20, Keoseong Park wrote:
>> Convert if (!ret) { ... } if (ret) { ... } into
>> if (!ret) { ... } else { ... }.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> index 7256e6c43ca6..3b794be53287 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -4670,7 +4670,7 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>   			ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
>>   			if (!ret)
>>   				ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
>> -			if (ret)
>> +			else
>>   				dev_err(hba->dev,
>>   					"Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n");
>>   		}
>
>If ufshcd_hba_enable() is modified it should be converted into the widely
>used "if error return" style. How about the untested patch below?

Thanks for your feedback.
That seems to be better.
I will apply it to the next version.

Best Regards,
Keoseong

>
>diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>index 05feec10fad3..89f8b86c3f85 100644
>--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>@@ -4668,14 +4668,16 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  		/* enable UIC related interrupts */
>  		ufshcd_enable_intr(hba, UFSHCD_UIC_MASK);
>  		ret = ufshcd_dme_reset(hba);
>-		if (!ret) {
>-			ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
>-			if (!ret)
>-				ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
>-			if (ret)
>-				dev_err(hba->dev,
>-					"Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n");
>+		if (ret) {
>+			dev_err(hba->dev, "DME_RESET failed\n");
>+			return ret;
>+		}
>+		ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
>+		if (ret) {
>+			dev_err(hba->dev, "Enabling DME failed\n");
>+			return ret;
>  		}
>+		ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
>  	} else {
>  		ret = ufshcd_hba_execute_hce(hba);
>  	}