Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: Initialize the clk_rate_request even if clk_core is NULL

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-10-18 06:52:57)
> Since commit c35e84b09776 ("clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request()"),
> users that used to initialize their clk_rate_request by initializing
> their local structure now rely on clk_hw_init_rate_request().
> 
> This function is backed by clk_core_init_rate_req(), which will skip the
> initialization if either the pointer to struct clk_core or to struct
> clk_rate_request are NULL.
> 
> However, the core->parent pointer might be NULL because the clock is
> orphan, and we will thus end up with our local struct clk_rate_request
> left untouched.
> 
> And since clk_hw_init_rate_request() doesn't return an error, we will
> then call a determine_rate variant with that unitialized structure.
> 
> In order to avoid this, let's clear our clk_rate_request if the pointer
> to it is valid but the pointer to struct clk_core isn't.
> 
> Fixes: c35e84b09776 ("clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request()")
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Applied to clk-fixes