Re: [PATCH v2] drm/format-helper: Only advertise supported formats for conversion

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:07:27 +0200
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> Am 27.10.22 um 15:57 schrieb Hector Martin:
> > drm_fb_build_fourcc_list() currently returns all emulated formats
> > unconditionally as long as the native format is among them, even though
> > not all combinations have conversion helpers. Although the list is
> > arguably provided to userspace in precedence order, userspace can pick
> > something out-of-order (and thus break when it shouldn't), or simply
> > only support a format that is unsupported (and thus think it can work,
> > which results in the appearance of a hang as FB blits fail later on,
> > instead of the initialization error you'd expect in this case).
> > 
> > Add checks to filter the list of emulated formats to only those
> > supported for conversion to the native format. This presumes that there
> > is a single native format (only the first is checked, if there are
> > multiple). Refactoring this API to drop the native list or support it
> > properly (by returning the appropriate emulated->native mapping table)
> > is left for a future patch.
> > 
> > The simpledrm driver is left as-is with a full table of emulated
> > formats. This keeps all currently working conversions available and
> > drops all the broken ones (i.e. this a strict bugfix patch, adding no
> > new supported formats nor removing any actually working ones). In order
> > to avoid proliferation of emulated formats, future drivers should
> > advertise only XRGB8888 as the sole emulated format (since some
> > userspace assumes its presence).
> > 
> > This fixes a real user regression where the ?RGB2101010 support commit
> > started advertising it unconditionally where not supported, and KWin
> > decided to start to use it over the native format and broke, but also
> > the fixes the spurious RGB565/RGB888 formats which have been wrongly
> > unconditionally advertised since the dawn of simpledrm.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6ea966fca084 ("drm/simpledrm: Add [AX]RGB2101010 formats")
> > Fixes: 11e8f5fd223b ("drm: Add simpledrm driver")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks for your patch. I have verified that video=-{16,24} still works 
> with simpledrm.
> 
> > ---
> > I'm proposing this alternative approach after a heated discussion on
> > IRC. I'm out of ideas, if y'all don't like this one you can figure it
> > out for yourseves :-)
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > This v2 moves all the changes to the helper (so they will apply to
> > the upcoming ofdrm, though ofdrm also needs to be fixed to trim its
> > format table to only formats that should be emulated, probably only
> > XRGB8888, to avoid further proliferating the use of conversions),
> > and avoids touching more than one file. The API still needs cleanup
> > as mentioned (supporting more than one native format is fundamentally
> > broken, since the helper would need to tell the driver *what* native
> > format to use for *each* emulated format somehow), but all current and
> > planned users only pass in one native format, so this can (and should)
> > be fixed later.
> > 
> > Aside: After other IRC discussion, I'm testing nuking the
> > XRGB2101010 <-> ARGB2101010 advertisement (which does not involve
> > conversion) by removing those entries from simpledrm in the Asahi Linux
> > downstream tree. As far as I'm concerned, it can be removed if nobody
> > complains (by removing those entries from the simpledrm array), if
> > maintainers are generally okay with removing advertised formats at all.
> > If so, there might be other opportunities for further trimming the list
> > non-native formats advertised to userspace.  
> 
> IMHO all of the extra A formats can immediately go. We have plenty of 
> simple drivers that only export XRGB8888 plus sometimes a few other 
> non-A formats. If anything in userspace had a hard dependency on an A 
> format, we'd probably heard about it.
> 
> In yesterday's discussion on IRC, it was said that several devices 
> advertise ARGB framebuffers when the hardware actually uses XRGB? Is 
> there hardware that supports transparent primary planes?

I'm fairly sure such hardware does exist, but I don't know if it's the
drivers in question here.

It's not uncommon to have extra hardware planes below the primary
plane, and then use alpha on primary plane to cut a hole to see through
to the "underlay" plane. This is a good setup for video playback, where
the video is on the underlay, and (a slow GPU or CPU renders) the
subtitles and UI on the primary plane.

I've heard that some hardware also has a separate background color
"plane" below all hardware planes, but I forget if upstream KMS exposes
that.

You'd find this mostly in "embedded" display chips.


Thanks,
pq

> Before removing the extra non-A formats, we first have to fix the fbdev 
> console's format selection. So if users set video=-24 without native 
> hardware support, simpledrm (and any other driver) falls back to a 
> supported format. This worked with the old fbdev drivers, such as 
> simplefb and efifb, and some users expect it.
> 
> If nothing else comes in, I'll merge your patch on Monday.
> 
> Best regards
> Thomas

Attachment: pgpL8XeTemygC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature