[PATCH -next 2/5] blk-iocost: improve hanlder of match_u64()

From: Yu Kuai
Date: Fri Oct 28 2022 - 05:49:39 EST


From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

1) There are one place that return value of match_u64() is not checked.
2) If match_u64() failed, return value is set to -EINVAL despite that
there are other possible errnos.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-iocost.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index fd495e823db2..c532129a1456 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -3202,6 +3202,7 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
char buf[32];
int tok;
+ int err;
s64 v;

if (!*p)
@@ -3209,7 +3210,12 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,

switch (match_token(p, qos_ctrl_tokens, args)) {
case QOS_ENABLE:
- match_u64(&args[0], &v);
+ err = match_u64(&args[0], &v);
+ if (err) {
+ ret = err;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
enable = v;
continue;
case QOS_CTRL:
@@ -3238,8 +3244,12 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
break;
case QOS_RLAT:
case QOS_WLAT:
- if (match_u64(&args[0], &v))
+ err = match_u64(&args[0], &v);
+ if (err) {
+ ret = err;
goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
qos[tok] = v;
break;
case QOS_MIN:
@@ -3374,6 +3384,7 @@ static ssize_t ioc_cost_model_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
char buf[32];
int tok;
+ int err;
u64 v;

if (!*p)
@@ -3399,8 +3410,13 @@ static ssize_t ioc_cost_model_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
tok = match_token(p, i_lcoef_tokens, args);
if (tok == NR_I_LCOEFS)
goto out_unlock;
- if (match_u64(&args[0], &v))
+
+ err = match_u64(&args[0], &v);
+ if (err) {
+ ret = err;
goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
u[tok] = v;
user = true;
}
--
2.31.1