Re: [PATCH v4 0/11] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing

[Cristian Marussi]

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:44:32AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> On 10/19/2022 1:46 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 

Hi Florian,

> > This series aims to introduce a new SCMI unified userspace interface meant
> > to ease testing an SCMI Server implementation for compliance, fuzzing etc.,
> > from the perspective of the OSPM agent (non-secure world only ...)
> > 
> > It is proposed as a testing/development facility, it is NOT meant to be a
> > feature to use in production, but only enabled in Kconfig for test
> > deployments.
> > 
> > Currently an SCMI Compliance Suite like the one at [1] can only work by
> > injecting SCMI messages at the SCMI transport layer using the mailbox test
> > driver (CONFIG_MAILBOX_TEST) via its few debugfs entries and looking at
> > the related replies from the SCMI backend Server.
> 
> I plan on giving this a try on our systems later today and will let you know
> the outcome.

Great ! It would be much appreciated...

> This is very useful for making sure the SCMI implementation is
> both correct and properly hardened.

... that was the plan :P

Note that the upstream SCMI ACS suite that I am using for stressing/testing
this Raw thing is still WIP in term of supporting Raw mode injection
(i.e. functional but ALL still to be merged)..but if you need I can give
you pointers on how to use it....unless of course you have your suite or
you just want to test using the shell as in the cover-letter examples...

... on my side I tried to fuzz me with a brutal

	'dd bs=128 count=1 if=/dev/random of=<scmi_raw>/message'

as a poor man fuzzying tool :D ... so I was thinking if it was meaningful
to think about upstreaming some common tools for fuzzying or simply
pre-building bare payloads (in proper endianity) to be injected with this
SCMI raw thing... (I mean something useful that could live in tools/)

...any feedbacks/hints in these regards are welcome.

Thanks,
Cristian