Re: [PATCH v4 09/13] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Add MT6795
From: Yassine Oudjana
Date: Sun Oct 30 2022 - 06:06:15 EST
On Fri, Oct 28 2022 at 16:01:58 -04:00:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 28/10/2022 11:35, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Combine MT6795 pin controller document into MT6779 one. In the
process, amend the example with comments and additional pinctrl
nodes from the MT6795 example, replace the current interrupts
property description with the one from the MT6795 document since
it makes more sense and define its items using conditionals
as they now vary between variants. Also use conditionals to define
valid values for the drive-strength property for each variant.
Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml | 189 ++++++++++-----
.../pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml | 227
------------------
2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 289 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
index 70e4ffa2d897..6f2cffe50b11 100644
---
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ title: Mediatek MT6779 Pin Controller
maintainers:
- Andy Teng <andy.teng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ - AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sean Wang <sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
description:
@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
compatible:
enum:
- mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl
+ - mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl
- mediatek,mt6797-pinctrl
reg:
@@ -43,9 +45,7 @@ properties:
interrupt-controller: true
interrupts:
- maxItems: 1
Leave the constraints.
Why? Because now you dropped it for mt6797... You bring here some
random
changes and it is difficult to review it.
Fair point. I'll undo this.
I was thinking that MT6797 doesn't take any interrupts at the moment,
but I'm certain the hardware does in fact have interrupts, so leaving
the constraint should both keep the bindings more accurate and reduce
the DT compatibility breakage when someone implements interrupts later.
- description: |
- Specifies the summary IRQ.
+ description: Interrupt outputs to the system interrupt
controller (sysirq).
"#interrupt-cells":
const: 2
@@ -57,59 +57,6 @@ required:
- gpio-controller
- "#gpio-cells"
-allOf:
- - $ref: "pinctrl.yaml#"
- - if:
- properties:
Make the move of this hunk in your description cleanup patch. Don't
mix
functional changes and some cleanups.
The idea was that drive-strength was to be defined first then have its
constraints set in the conditionals, so I moved this below the
patternProperties block to accomplish that. Now I'm thinking of putting
it here to begin with so that I wouldn't need to move it in this patch.
What do you think?
- compatible:
- contains:
- const: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl
- then:
- properties:
- reg:
- minItems: 9
- maxItems: 9
-
- reg-names:
- items:
- - const: gpio
- - const: iocfg_rm
- - const: iocfg_br
- - const: iocfg_lm
- - const: iocfg_lb
- - const: iocfg_rt
- - const: iocfg_lt
- - const: iocfg_tl
- - const: eint
- - if:
- properties:
- compatible:
- contains:
- const: mediatek,mt6797-pinctrl
- then:
- properties:
- reg:
- minItems: 5
- maxItems: 5
-
- reg-names:
- items:
- - const: gpio
- - const: iocfgl
- - const: iocfgb
- - const: iocfgr
- - const: iocfgt
- - if:
- properties:
- reg-names:
- contains:
- const: eint
- then:
- required:
- - interrupts
- - interrupt-controller
- - "#interrupt-cells"
-
patternProperties:
'-pins$':
type: object
@@ -169,8 +116,7 @@ patternProperties:
input-schmitt-disable: true
- drive-strength:
- enum: [2, 4, 8, 12, 16]
+ drive-strength: true
slew-rate:
enum: [0, 1]
@@ -202,6 +148,110 @@ patternProperties:
additionalProperties: false
+allOf:
+ - $ref: "pinctrl.yaml#"
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ minItems: 9
+ maxItems: 9
+
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: gpio
+ - const: iocfg_rm
+ - const: iocfg_br
+ - const: iocfg_lm
+ - const: iocfg_lb
+ - const: iocfg_rt
+ - const: iocfg_lt
+ - const: iocfg_tl
+ - const: eint
+
+ interrupts:
+ items:
+ - description: EINT interrupt
+
+ patternProperties:
+ '-pins$':
+ patternProperties:
+ '^pins':
+ properties:
+ drive-strength:
+ enum: [2, 4, 8, 12, 16]
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: mediatek,mt6795-pinctrl
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 2
+
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: base
+ - const: eint
+
+ interrupts:
+ items:
+ - description: EINT interrupt
+ - description: EINT event_b interrupt
+
+ patternProperties:
+ '-pins$':
+ patternProperties:
+ '^pins':
+ properties:
+ drive-strength:
+ enum: [2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16]
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: mediatek,mt6797-pinctrl
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ minItems: 5
+ maxItems: 5
+
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: gpio
+ - const: iocfgl
+ - const: iocfgb
+ - const: iocfgr
+ - const: iocfgt
+
+ patternProperties:
+ '-pins$':
+ patternProperties:
+ '^pins':
+ properties:
+ drive-strength:
+ enum: [2, 4, 8, 12, 16]
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ reg-names:
+ contains:
+ const: eint
+ then:
+ required:
+ - interrupts
+ - interrupt-controller
+ - "#interrupt-cells"
+
additionalProperties: false
examples:
@@ -237,8 +287,9 @@ examples:
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 204 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
- mmc0_pins_default: mmc0-0 {
- cmd-dat-pins {
How this is related to the patch?
Organize the patches so they are easy for review.
Sorry, this was meant to be in the previous patch that changed the
subnode name patterns. I'll move it there for the next revision.
Thanks,
Yassine