Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Conor,

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 10:46 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 10:37:01PM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 6:24 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 05:59:14PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > The RZ/Five microprocessor includes a RISC-V CPU Core (AX45MP Single)
> > > > 1.0 GHz, 16-bit DDR3L/DDR4 interface. And it also has many interfaces such
> > > > as Gbit-Ether, CAN, and USB 2.0, making it ideal for applications such as
> > > > entry-class social infrastructure gateway control and industrial gateway
> > > > control.
> > > >
> > > > This patch series adds initial SoC DTSi support for Renesas RZ/Five
> > > > (R9A07G043) SoC. Below is the list of IP blocks enabled in the initial
> > > > board DTS which can be used to boot via initramfs on RZ/Five SMARC EVK:
> > > > - AX45MP CPU
> > > > - CPG
> > > > - PINCTRL
> > >
> > > Hey,
> > > Looks like you've got a pair of warnings here from dtbs_check. I tested
> > > this on top of 20221028's next, with the three branches below merged in,
> > > hopefully my merges aren't the source of them:
> > >
> > > linux/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043f01-smarc.dtb: pinctrl@11030000: 'interrupt-controller' is a required property
> > >         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rzg2l-pinctrl.yaml
> > > linux/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043f01-smarc.dtb: pinctrl@11030000: '#interrupt-cells' is a required property
> > >         From schema: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rzg2l-pinctrl.yaml
> > >
> > Thanks for the review and test. The warnings above are coming from [0]
> > as support for IRQC is missing, once that is added the warnings should
> > go away.
>
> Right. I merged in the stuff in Geert's trees & I don't think I saw any
> pending patches in the cover that I missed. Is there something else that
> adds the support that's not going to make v6.2? I got rid of all the
> dtbs_check warnings for v6.1 and I'd really like to keep things that
> way!
>
Sorry that pacth wasn't posted yet so I hadn't mentioned it in the
cover letter. I'll make sure I get it posted asap and merged for v6.2.

Cheers,
Prabhakar