Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: qlge: Separate multiple assignments

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:25:14AM -0400, drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Drake Talley <drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Adhere to coding style.
> 
> Reported by checkpatch:
> 
> > CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided
> > #4088: FILE: drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c:4088
> 
> > CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided
> > #4108: FILE: drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c:4108:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Drake Talley <drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
> index 1ead7793062a..8c1fdd8ebba0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
> @@ -4085,7 +4085,12 @@ static struct net_device_stats *qlge_get_stats(struct net_device
>  	int i;
>  
>  	/* Get RX stats. */
> -	pkts = mcast = dropped = errors = bytes = 0;
> +	pkts = 0;
> +	mcast = 0;
> +	dropped = 0;
> +	errors = 0;
> +	bytes = 0;
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < qdev->rss_ring_count; i++, rx_ring++) {
>  		pkts += rx_ring->rx_packets;
>  		bytes += rx_ring->rx_bytes;
> @@ -4100,7 +4105,10 @@ static struct net_device_stats *qlge_get_stats(struct net_device
>  	ndev->stats.multicast = mcast;
>  
>  	/* Get TX stats. */
> -	pkts = errors = bytes = 0;
> +	pkts = 0;
> +	errors = 0;
> +	bytes = 0;
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < qdev->tx_ring_count; i++, tx_ring++) {
>  		pkts += tx_ring->tx_packets;
>  		bytes += tx_ring->tx_bytes;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
  properly describe the change.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot