Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] cfg80211: Avoid clashing function prototypes

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

On 10/28/22 03:22, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hm.
>
> If you're splitting out per driver,
>
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
> > @@ -9870,7 +9870,7 @@ static int ipw_wx_sw_reset(struct net_device *dev,
> >   
> >   /* Rebase the WE IOCTLs to zero for the handler array */
> >   static iw_handler ipw_wx_handlers[] = {
> > -	IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWNAME, (iw_handler)cfg80211_wext_giwname),
> > +	IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWNAME, cfg80211_wext_giwname),
>
> I can see how this (and similar) still belongs into this patch since
> it's related to the cfg80211 change, but
>
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/wext.c
> > @@ -154,9 +154,10 @@ static struct iw_statistics *orinoco_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device *dev)
> >   
> >   static int orinoco_ioctl_setwap(struct net_device *dev,
> >   				struct iw_request_info *info,
> > -				struct sockaddr *ap_addr,
> > +				union iwreq_data *wrqu,
> >   				char *extra)
> >   {
> > +	struct sockaddr *ap_addr = &wrqu->ap_addr;
>
> why this (and similar) too?

mmh... yeah; orinoco should be a separate patch. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo