Re: [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: rt5682: Support dbvdd and ldo1-in supplies

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:38:10PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:

> We could have both if we converted the existing ones to lowercase first, but as
> I mentioned in [1] this requires using devm_regulator_get_optional() before
> falling back, which seemed like an abuse of that API and to unnecessarily
> complicate the code.

Yeah, it's definitely not what the ABI is for and probably more trouble
than it's worth.  We *could* probably write some helpers that handle
legacy supply names to the regulator core code if someone really wanted
to retire old names, that way the complication would be shared between
users which seems more managable but someone would still need the time
and enthusiasm to write the code.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature