Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: tool: unit tests all check parser errors, standardize formatting a bit

[Daniel Latypov]

On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:38 PM David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:40 AM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development
> <kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Let's verify that the parser isn't reporting any errors for valid
> > inputs.
> >
> > This change also
> > * does result.status checking on one line
> > * makes sure we consistently do it outside of the `with` block
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Looks good, thanks.
>
> Note that this patch does conflict with "kunit: tool: print summary of
> failed tests if a few failed out of a lot":
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=f19dd011d8de6f0c1d20abea5158aa4f5d9cea44
> It's only a context line issue, though.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>

Oh huh, I rebased onto the kunit branch and it managed to merge cleanly.
I guess `git am` is more picky than `git rebase`.

I'll send a v2 that's rebased to avoid issues applying them.