On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:00:45PM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
在2022年11月10日十一月 下午9:07,Bjorn Helgaas写道:I think we should wait until somebody else has this problem.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 02:42:40PM +0800, Liu Peibao wrote:Should we make this into common PCI code?
The PCI Controller of 2k1000 could not mask devices by setting vender ID orLooks nice and simple, thanks for trying this out.
device ID in configuration space header as invalid values. When there are
pins shareable between the platform device and PCI device, if the platform
device is preferred, we should not scan this PCI device. In the above
scene, add `status = "disabled"` property in DT node of this PCI device.
Signed-off-by: Liu Peibao <liupeibao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V3 -> V4: 1. get rid of the masklist and search the status property
directly.
2. check the status property only when accessing the vendor ID.
V2 -> V3: 1. use list_for_each_entry() for more clearly.
2. fix wrong use of sizeof().
V1 -> V2: use existing property "status" instead of adding new property.
drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
index 05c50408f13b..efca0b3b5a29 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
@@ -194,6 +194,17 @@ static void __iomem *pci_loongson_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
return NULL;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ /* Don't access disabled devices. */
+ if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) && where == PCI_VENDOR_ID) {
+ struct device_node *dn;
+
+ dn = of_pci_find_child_device(bus->dev.of_node, devfn);
+ if (dn && !of_device_is_available(dn))
+ return NULL;
+ }
+#endif
I guess Loongson won’t be the last platform having such problem.
It's not a completely trivial situation because if the device uses PCI
memory or I/O space, we have to worry about how that space is handled.
Does the BIOS assign that space? Is it included in the host bridge
_CRS or "ranges" properties? If the device is below any PCI bridges
(I don't think that's the case in your situation), how does the space
it requires get routed through the bridges?
It would be nice to say something in this commit log about whether
these are issues on your platform.
--/* CFG0 can only access standard space */
if (where < PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE && priv->cfg0_base)
return cfg0_map(priv, bus, devfn, where);
--
2.20.1
- Jiaxun