Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: Add listening address to SYN flood message

[Jamie Bainbridge]

On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 04:20, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:59:32 +1100
> Jamie Bainbridge <jamie.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +         xchg(&queue->synflood_warned, 1) == 0) {
> > +             if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
> > +                     net_info_ratelimited("%s: Possible SYN flooding on port %pI6c.%u. %s.\n",
> > +                                     proto, &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
> > +                                     sk->sk_num, msg);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     net_info_ratelimited("%s: Possible SYN flooding on port %pI4.%u. %s.\n",
> > +                                     proto, &sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> > +                                     sk->sk_num, msg);
>
> Minor nit, the standard format for printing addresses would be to use colon seperator before port
>
>                 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
>                         net_info_ratelimited("%s: Possible SYN flooding on [%pI6c]:%u. %s.\n",
>                                         proto, &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num, msg);
>                 } else {
>                         net_info_ratelimited("%s: Possible SYN flooding on %pI4:%u. %s.\n",
>                                         proto, &sk->sk_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num, msg);

I considered this too, though Eric suggested "IP.port" to match tcpdump.

Please let me know which advice to follow?

Jamie