Re: [PATCH v7 15/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce dma-ranges property support for RC-host

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Mon Nov 14 2022 - 12:58:39 EST

Next message: Masahiro Yamada: "Re: [PATCH 02/46] kbuild: pass jobserver to cmd_ld_vmlinux.o"
Previous message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] list: Introduce list_count() to count existing nodes"
In reply to: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH v7 15/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce dma-ranges property support for RC-host"
Next in thread: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH v7 15/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce dma-ranges property support for RC-host"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:32:27AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:09:15PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:12:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > In accordance with the generic PCIe Root Port DT-bindings the "dma-ranges"
> > > property has the same format as the "ranges" property. The only difference
> > > is in their semantics. The "dma-ranges" property describes the PCIe-to-CPU
> > > memory mapping in opposite to the CPU-to-PCIe mapping of the "ranges"
> > > property. Even though the DW PCIe controllers are normally equipped with
> > > the internal Address Translation Unit which inbound and outbound tables
> > > can be used to implement both properties semantics, it was surprising for
> > > me to discover that the host-related part of the DW PCIe driver currently
> > > supports the "ranges" property only while the "dma-ranges" windows are
> > > just ignored. Having the "dma-ranges" supported in the driver would be
> > > very handy for the platforms, that don't tolerate the 1:1 CPU-PCIe memory
> > > mapping and require a customized PCIe memory layout. So let's fix that by
> > > introducing the "dma-ranges" property support.
> > >
> > > First of all we suggest to rename the dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() method to
> > > dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu() and create a new version of the
> > > dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() function. Thus we'll have two methods for the
> > > RC and EP controllers respectively in the same way as it has been
> > > developed for the outbound ATU setup methods.
> > >
> >
>
> > I think you should split the function renaming part into a separate patch.
>
> Don't see this necessary especially at the current stage of the
> patchset. Without this modification the renaming isn't required. So
> should a revert-patch is applied both of the updates will be undone.
>

There is no necessity for both API renaming and dma-ranges implementation to be
in the same patch as long as first one is functionally independent. But I'll
defer it to you.

> >
> > > Secondly aside with the memory window index and type the new
> > > dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() function will accept CPU address, PCIe address
> > > and size as its arguments. These parameters define the PCIe and CPU memory
> > > ranges which will be used to setup the respective inbound ATU mapping. The
> > > passed parameters need to be verified against the ATU ranges constraints
> > > in the same way as it is done for the outbound ranges.
> > >
> > > Finally the DMA-ranges detected for the PCIe controller need to be
> > > converted to the inbound ATU entries during the host controller
> > > initialization procedure. It will be done in the framework of the
> > > dw_pcie_iatu_setup() method. Note before setting the inbound ranges up we
> > > need to disable all the inbound ATU entries in order to prevent unexpected
> > > PCIe TLPs translations defined by some third party software like
> > > bootloaders.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changelog v3:
> > > - Drop inbound iATU window size alignment constraint. (@Manivannan)
> > > ---
> > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 +-
> > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 32 ++++++++++-
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 6 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > > index 83ddb190292e..237bb01d7852 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > > @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ret = dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(pci, func_no, free_win, type,
> > > - cpu_addr, bar);
> > > + ret = dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu(pci, func_no, free_win, type,
> > > + cpu_addr, bar);
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to program IB window\n");
> > > return ret;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > index 39f3b37d4033..ea923c25e12d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > @@ -643,12 +643,15 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * Ensure all outbound windows are disabled before proceeding with
> > > - * the MEM/IO ranges setups.
> > > + * Ensure all out/inbound windows are disabled before proceeding with
> > > + * the MEM/IO (dma-)ranges setups.
> > > */
> > > for (i = 0; i < pci->num_ob_windows; i++)
> > > dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_OB, i);
> > >
> > > + for (i = 0; i < pci->num_ib_windows; i++)
> > > + dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, i);
> > > +
> > > i = 0;
> > > resource_list_for_each_entry(entry, &pp->bridge->windows) {
> > > if (resource_type(entry->res) != IORESOURCE_MEM)
> > > @@ -685,9 +688,32 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (pci->num_ob_windows <= i)
> > > - dev_warn(pci->dev, "Resources exceed number of ATU entries (%d)\n",
> > > + dev_warn(pci->dev, "Ranges exceed outbound iATU size (%d)\n",
> > > pci->num_ob_windows);
> > >
> > > + i = 0;
> > > + resource_list_for_each_entry(entry, &pp->bridge->dma_ranges) {
> > > + if (resource_type(entry->res) != IORESOURCE_MEM)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + if (pci->num_ib_windows <= i)
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + ret = dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(pci, i++, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM,
> > > + entry->res->start,
> > > + entry->res->start - entry->offset,
> > > + resource_size(entry->res));
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to set DMA range %pr\n",
> > > + entry->res);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (pci->num_ib_windows <= i)
> > > + dev_warn(pci->dev, "Dma-ranges exceed inbound iATU size (%u)\n",
> >
>
> > s/Dma/dma
>
> Well, I could also make it like DMA-ranges. It depends on what you
> imply by the message. I've made it looking like the Ranges-related
> counterpart.
>

Either "DMA" or "dma" looks good. I haven't seen "Dma" mostly.

Thanks,
Mani

> -Sergey
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > > + pci->num_ib_windows);
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > index c6725c519a47..ca830ee794a7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > @@ -393,8 +393,60 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg
> > > dw_pcie_writel_atu(pci, PCIE_ATU_REGION_DIR_IB, index, reg, val);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > > - int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar)
> > > +int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> > > + u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size)
> > > +{
> > > + u64 limit_addr = pci_addr + size - 1;
> > > + u32 retries, val;
> > > +
> > > + if ((limit_addr & ~pci->region_limit) != (pci_addr & ~pci->region_limit) ||
> > > + !IS_ALIGNED(cpu_addr, pci->region_align) ||
> > > + !IS_ALIGNED(pci_addr, pci->region_align) || !size) {
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE,
> > > + lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE,
> > > + upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
> > > +
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_LIMIT,
> > > + lower_32_bits(limit_addr));
> > > + if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 460A))
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT,
> > > + upper_32_bits(limit_addr));
> > > +
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET,
> > > + lower_32_bits(cpu_addr));
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET,
> > > + upper_32_bits(cpu_addr));
> > > +
> > > + val = type;
> > > + if (upper_32_bits(limit_addr) > upper_32_bits(pci_addr) &&
> > > + dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 460A))
> > > + val |= PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE;
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_REGION_CTRL1, val);
> > > + dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_REGION_CTRL2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Make sure ATU enable takes effect before any subsequent config
> > > + * and I/O accesses.
> > > + */
> > > + for (retries = 0; retries < LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES; retries++) {
> > > + val = dw_pcie_readl_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_REGION_CTRL2);
> > > + if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n");
> > > +
> > > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > > + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar)
> > > {
> > > u32 retries, val;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > > index a871ae7eb59e..37801bbce854 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > > @@ -346,8 +346,10 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> > > u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size);
> > > int dw_pcie_prog_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > > int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size);
> > > -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > > - int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar);
> > > +int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> > > + u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size);
> > > +int dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > > + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar);
> > > void dw_pcie_disable_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 dir, int index);
> > > void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci);
> > > void dw_pcie_iatu_detect(struct dw_pcie *pci);
> > > --
> > > 2.38.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Next message: Masahiro Yamada: "Re: [PATCH 02/46] kbuild: pass jobserver to cmd_ld_vmlinux.o"
Previous message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] list: Introduce list_count() to count existing nodes"
In reply to: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH v7 15/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce dma-ranges property support for RC-host"
Next in thread: Serge Semin: "Re: [PATCH v7 15/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce dma-ranges property support for RC-host"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]