Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: uapi: add HWCAP for Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Thu Nov 24 2022 - 12:20:50 EST
On 24/11/2022 17:12, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> [You don't often get email from sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:55:01AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>>
>>> Patch #1 is definitely needed regardless of which interface we pick for
>>> exposing the ISA strings to userspace.
>>
>> I took another look at #1, and I feel more confused about what
>> constitutes canonical order than I did before! If you know better than
>> I, and you probably do since you're interested in these 6 month old
>> patches, some insight would be appreciated!
>
> Assuming we don't go with hwcap, I dont think the order of the
> riscv_isa_ext_id enum matters that much?
The chief put it in canonical order so that's good enough for me!
>
> iiuc we're building the cpuinfo string from the riscv_isa_ext_data
> array, and I think the current code is incorrect:
>
> static struct riscv_isa_ext_data isa_ext_arr[] = {
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sstc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA("", RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX),
> };
>
> zicbom and zihintpause should come before supervisor level extensions.
> I'm going to send a patch for that.
idk, Palmer explicitly re-ordered this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220920204518.10988-1-palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
By my reading of the isa manual, what Palmer did is correct as
those are not "Additional Standard Extensions". /shrug
>
> And the Zb/Zk ones should come after the Zi ones, and before the
> supervisor level ones (The I category comes before the B or the K one).
This I agree with though.