Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/bridge: anx7625: Register Type C mode switches
From: Pin-yen Lin
Date: Fri Nov 25 2022 - 01:59:20 EST
Hi Andy,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 8:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 06:20:54PM +0800, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> > Register USB Type-C mode switches when the "mode-switch" property and
> > relevant port are available in Device Tree. Configure the crosspoint
> > switch based on the entered alternate mode for a specific Type-C
> > connector.
>
> ...
>
> > +static void anx7625_typec_two_ports_update(struct anx7625_data *ctx)
> > +{
> > + if (ctx->typec_ports[0].dp_connected && ctx->typec_ports[1].dp_connected)
> > + /* Both ports available, do nothing to retain the current one. */
> > + return;
>
> > + else if (ctx->typec_ports[0].dp_connected)
>
> This 'else' is redundant. I would rewrite above as
>
> /* Check if both ports available and do nothing to retain the current one */
> if (ctx->typec_ports[0].dp_connected && ctx->typec_ports[1].dp_connected)
> return;
>
> if (ctx->typec_ports[0].dp_connected)
>
> > + anx7625_set_crosspoint_switch(ctx, TYPEC_ORIENTATION_NORMAL);
> > + else if (ctx->typec_ports[1].dp_connected)
> > + anx7625_set_crosspoint_switch(ctx, TYPEC_ORIENTATION_REVERSE);
> > +}
Thanks for the detailed suggestion. I'll adapt this in v7.
>
> ...
>
> > + data->dp_connected = (state->alt && state->alt->svid == USB_TYPEC_DP_SID &&
> > + state->alt->mode == USB_TYPEC_DP_MODE);
>
> Parentheses are not needed.
Will fix this in v7.
>
> ...
>
> > + /*
> > + * <0 1> refers to SSRX1/SSTX1, and <2 3> refers to SSRX2/SSTX2.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_lanes; i++) {
>
> > + if (port_num != -1 && port_num != dp_lanes[i] / 2) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid data lane numbers\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> According to Rob Linux must not validate device tree. If you need it, use
> proper YAML schema.
>
> > + port_num = dp_lanes[i] / 2;
> > + }
>
I'll remove this from the driver in v7.
> ...
>
> > + if (!ctx->num_typec_switches) {
> > + dev_warn(dev, "No Type-C switches node found\n");
>
> > + return ret;
>
> Why not to return 0 explicitly?
Will update to just "return 0" in v7.
>
> > + }
>
> ...
>
> > + ctx->typec_ports = devm_kcalloc(
>
> Broken indentation.
Will fix in v7
>
> > + dev, ctx->num_typec_switches, sizeof(struct anx7625_port_data),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!ctx->typec_ports)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ...
>
> > +struct anx7625_port_data {
>
> > + bool dp_connected;
>
> You can save some bytes on some architectures if move this to be last field.
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll do so in v7
>
> > + struct typec_mux_dev *typec_mux;
> > + struct anx7625_data *ctx;
> > +};
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>