On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:48 PM Deepak Gupta <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:No specific reason.
Why not TASK_TI_CPU ?
index df9444397908..a7da051159cf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
OFFSET(TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP, task_struct, thread_info.kernel_sp);
OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SP, task_struct, thread_info.user_sp);
+ OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F2, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[2]);